These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- Anti-Money Laundering
- Features
- Remediation and Retesting
Remediation and Retesting
Follow a finding through corrective work and an independent retest.
OverviewSubmitted Corrective Actions×
Anti-Money Laundering · Remediation and Retesting
New
Submitted Corrective Actions
Approval conditions
| Finding | Owner | Due at | Completed at | Evidence | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FND-8358 | 10 Oct | EVD-970 | Submitted | |||
| FND-6178 | 16 Oct | EVD-379 | Submitted | |||
| FND-4486 | 14 Oct | EVD-698 | Submitted | |||
| FND-6591 | 15 Oct | EVD-205 | Submitted | |||
| FND-2707 | 17 Oct | EVD-710 | Submitted |
6 of 6 records
EVD-970Corrective actions · CA-89501
SubmittedFindingFND-8358
Due at10 Oct
What you can do
Keep the finding open until the evidence supports closure
A completed corrective action is a claim that work has been done. An independent retest checks whether that work resolved the finding. The Remediation Owner records the action and completion evidence, while the Independent Reviewer evaluates the result against the finding and control. This gives the AML Program Manager a clear basis for closing the assessment.
Keep the finding’s severity and description visible during the work. A Critical finding should remain identifiable when its action is submitted for verification. Closing an action without understanding the original control failure can leave the team with a tidy queue and an unresolved assessment question.
How the work is organized
- Finding and assignment. Record the finding against its assessment and control. Move it from Open to Action planned when the Remediation Owner has a defined corrective action. Set a due date that the owner understands and can explain to the program manager.
- Action evidence. Track work through Planned and In progress, then submit the actual completion date and evidence. Submitted signals a request for verification. The owner should show what changed and how the reviewer can inspect it.
- Independent retest. Record the reviewer, test date and evidence with Pass, Fail or Inconclusive. A passing retest supports verification and finding closure. Failed or inconclusive work stays available for further investigation and another corrective effort.
What to agree during setup
Agree how the team writes a useful corrective action and what evidence will demonstrate completion. Confirm that the reviewer is independent of the action owner. Before accepting retest evidence, check the assessment’s reviewed approval, positive revision and resolved business period.
Decide how to handle overdue work and how a failed retest returns to the owner for further attention. Keep earlier results available when a later attempt succeeds. The team needs to understand the sequence without treating a new completion date as proof that the previous failure never happened.
Check the handoff on an actual case
Take a finding about missing evidence of alert review. The Remediation Owner updates the working procedure and supplies completion evidence, then submits the action. The Independent Reviewer samples the corrected work and records an Inconclusive retest because the material does not yet establish the outcome. The finding remains in Retest.
After further work, record a passing retest with supporting evidence. Verify the submitted action and close the finding only after that review. Ask the AML Program Manager to trace the original finding through both retest outcomes before closing the assessment. The demonstration should make clear which evidence supported the final decision and why completion alone was insufficient.
What your team sees
- Open Findings — Review unresolved findings by severity, assessment and control.
- My Corrective Actions — Follow assigned corrective work with due dates and completion evidence.
- Submitted Corrective Actions — Inspect work waiting for independent verification.
Follow the work through
Rehearse remediation to retest and use the reporting guide to review overdue work alongside finding severity.
What it keeps track of
Data model- Findings
- Control test findings requiring remediation
- Corrective actions
- Remediation actions owned against findings
- Retests
- Independent retests of remediated findings
- Assessments
- Scoped AML control assessments
- Controls
- AML controls mitigating identified risks
- Review decisions
- Independent review decisions on submitted revisions
Who uses it
Permissions- Remediation Owner
- , Independent Reviewer, AML Program Manager.
- The owner supplies completion evidence; the reviewer determines whether the retest supports closure.
Set up Anti-Money Laundering your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.