1. Construction Punch List
  2. Process
  3. Evidence review
Process · Evidence review

Evidence review

A site correction is easier to verify when its attachment, review decision and operation receipt can be traced to the same punch item. Use the record reference to follow each result rather than relying on a file name or a status label alone.

Step by step

  1. Record deficiency Site Superintendent

    Site Superintendent identifies the defect and records its reported date and package.

    • Establishes the finding's identity and scope
    • Updates Punch items, Work packages
  2. Complete trade work Foreman

    Foreman adds the correction details and a site photo attachment to the item.

    • Links the site photo and correction
    • Updates Punch items, Record attachments
  3. Review sign-off Inspector

    Inspector checks the correction and evidence before submission. Submission runs the approval check and records its result.

    • Preserves decision and execution result
    • Updates Punch items, Review decisions, Operation receipts
    ApprovalA person approves before the work moves on.
  4. Invoice closeout task Project Manager

    Project Manager checks a closeout task under the same work package and its operation result before billing follow-up.

    • Preserves billing action outcome
    • Updates Tasks, Operation receipts
Site Superintendent
Prepares site evidence; Foreman uploads correction evidence; Inspector checks the correction before submission; Project Manager reviews the outcome.

Set up Construction Punch List your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started