Requirements

A requirement line records the item the office must examine for a case. The Case Officer can record its description, sequence, quantity, unit, observed date and source reference. Each line carries an outcome, so a pending item remains visible until the team accepts or rejects it. The parent case ties the line to the application being reviewed. A decision reason can explain a rejected item without losing the original observation.

Application requirements holds observation-level detail for the case: sequence, description, quantity, unit, observed date and source reference. The outcome can remain pending or be marked accepted or rejected. A rejection can carry a decision reason. The parent link keeps each line with its case so the Authorized Reviewer can see what was examined for the submitted revision. The Case Officer should preserve the original source reference when a line is corrected.

• Record. application requirements holds observation-level detail for the case: sequence, description, quantity, unit, observed date and source reference.
• Review. Agree which observations need separate lines and how officers order them.
• Handoff. At handoff, show the reviewer the source reference and outcome for every material line.

Agree which observations need separate lines and how officers order them. Decide which source reference identifies each item, who may mark its outcome and when a rejected line needs a reason. An unresolved line should remain visible in the pending view until the evidence question is answered. Do not treat a completed-line count as a substitute for reading the individual outcomes.

Rehearse one application with lines that have different outcomes. The Case Officer records the observation and source for each, then checks the parent case link. Ask the Authorized Reviewer to explain which lines can support a decision and which need follow-up. If a correction changes a line after review, identify the successor case revision and request another independent decision.

Choose a case with several different evidence items. Enter each item as a separate requirement line with a source reference. Mark one line accepted and another rejected with a reason, leaving an unresolved item pending. The reviewer should be able to see which source each conclusion relies on. Correct a mistaken line through the case revision process rather than silently changing the basis of an earlier decision.

At handoff, show the reviewer the source reference and outcome for every material line. A rejected line should have a reason that another officer can understand. If one line stays pending, assign the evidence question through a case action and keep it visible in the pending list.

• Pending requirement lines — Find observations still awaiting an outcome.
• Rejected requirement lines — Read reasons and source references for rejected items.

Follow case review from preparation to independent decision. Use delivery and correction when an approved outcome needs execution or an earlier revision needs correction.