1. Environmental Compliance
  2. Features
  3. Assessment testing
Feature · Assessment testing

Assessment testing

Plan a review period and keep individual test evidence tied to its controls.

OverviewControl test exceptions
Environmental Compliance · Assessment testing

Control test exceptions

Assessment tests

New
ParentControlControl codeTested atResultException count
ASS-10580CNT-8274CC-44514 OctFail39
ASS-15134CNT-4242CC-42911 OctInconclusive29
ASS-53710CNT-4467CC-60913 OctFail20
ASS-28935CNT-8057CC-28507 OctInconclusive26
ASS-26082CNT-7323CC-74814 OctFail4
6 of 6 records
CC-445Assessment tests · AT-38418
Fail
ParentASS-10580
ControlCNT-8274
Tested at14 Oct
Exception count39
Evidence referenceER-822
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Run the period from a single assessment

The assessment identifies the subject, period, scope, organization, business unit and owner. Its planned test count gives the owner a target for preparation. The status follows work from draft through planning, testing, review, approval, remediation and closure. The Operations Overview gives the lead a place to see control testing and exceptions alongside permit measurements needing attention.

Each test is an individual record under the assessment. It names the linked control, line number and revision; it can record a test date, sample size, exception count, result and evidence reference. A pending result differs from a pass, failure or inconclusive result. The owner should use the test record to explain what was checked, then use a finding when a failed or inconclusive result needs assigned corrective work.

How the work is organized

  • Period. Set the start and end dates, subject and scope before asking testers to work.
  • Test line. Keep the control link and result on each test, with an evidence reference people can follow.
  • Exception. Open a finding against the assessment and control when the result calls for corrective work.

What to agree during setup

Agree how many tests the assessment owner expects and how the team will identify each line. Decide what evidence reference is sufficient for a pass and what explanation is needed for an inconclusive result. The test result alone does not explain a failed sample; the related finding should state the issue in terms an action owner can investigate. Agree who reviews the assessment before it is approved and how remediation affects closure.

A pilot should use a complete period with at least one ordinary passing test and one exception. Let the lead compare the planned count with entered test lines, and inspect the linked control on each exception. The independent reviewer should see the evidence without relying on the tester’s memory or a private folder.

Check the handoff on an actual case

An assessment owner opens a spring review for a treatment unit and plans tests against its active controls. A tester records a sample of discharge log entries for one control. Most samples support the control, but one lacks the required operating record. The tester marks the line as failed, records the exception count and identifies the evidence. The lead opens a finding tied to that control and assessment, assigns corrective work, and leaves the assessment in a stage that reflects unresolved work.

Later, a separate reviewer looks at the corrective evidence and enters a retest. The assessment owner can trace that outcome back to the original line and explain why the period was approved or kept open. This matters when the period also contains permit measurements under independent review.

What your team sees

  • Assessments in progress — See periods that need testing, review or remediation.
  • Control test exceptions — Find failed or inconclusive lines with their evidence references.
  • Assessment workboard — Move through status groups without losing the named owner.

Follow the work through

What it keeps track of

Data model
Assessments
Compliance assessment periods covering planned tests and review.
Assessment tests
Individual evidence-based control tests within an assessment.
Controls
Controls mitigating a risk, with owner and effective date.
Findings
Issues raised from failed or inconclusive control testing.
Corrective actions
Remediation work assigned against a finding.
Retests
Independent retests that verify corrective action effectiveness.

Who uses it

Permissions
Assessment Owner
, Control Owner, Compliance Lead, Independent Reviewer

Set up Environmental Compliance your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started