Multi-entity finance

No. The system coordinates close work and evidence above your ledger. Accounting continues to own accounts, posting, reversals and actual period locks. The implementation must verify its supported connections and source mappings.

Yes. Map the recurring work to effective task templates, owners, reviewers and dependencies. Each launched period retains a snapshot, so later template changes do not silently rewrite the active close.

No. Matching balances can help preparation, but the assigned person must attest to the evidence and the required independent review and certification still apply. Missing source data must not be treated as zero.

The configured required people sign their assigned capacities against the same evidence revision. Controller and CFO signatures use separately assigned identities where required. Internal Auditor concurrence is separate from management approval.

Only after the owning ledger confirms the exact entity, period and expected revision are closed. A requested, failed or uncertain lock remains visible until resolved. Downstream handoff waits for confirmation and retained audit-pack publication.

A permitted correction requires a documented request with Controller / CFO and distinct Admin authorization. Reopening is confirmed by the ledger. Preserve the previous lock and pack, increment the close revision and repeat affected review before relocking.

No. It records the company-defined testing population, evidence and decisions. Legal applicability, management assertions and independent audit opinions remain with the responsible people and advisers.

Explicit grants identify the entity and period, with expiry and revocation. Every evidence page, attachment and export must enforce that scope, including links copied from an earlier session.