These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- Financial Planning & Analysis
- Features
- Budget versus actual
Budget versus actual
Follow cost center variance from the ranked summary to the plan lines behind it.
OverviewApproved Plans×
Financial Planning & Analysis · Budget versus actual
New
Approved Plans
Plans
| Plan number | Plan name | Fiscal year | Organization | Plan owner | Total plan amount | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLN-93991 | Plan 772 | FY-985 | ORG-3635 | 640 | ||
| PLN-72387 | Plan 506 | FY-173 | ORG-7134 | 900 | ||
| PLN-25172 | Plan 425 | FY-516 | ORG-5523 | 70 | ||
| PLN-30495 | Plan 945 | FY-866 | ORG-1785 | 360 | ||
| PLN-67863 | Plan 943 | FY-619 | ORG-1700 | 500 |
6 of 6 records
Plan 772Plans · PLN-93991
Fiscal yearFY-985
OrganizationORG-3635
Total plan amount640
Total actual amount150
What you can do
Budget versus actual in daily work
Budget vs Actual compares planned spend with recorded actuals by cost center. It ranks variance and lets the reader open the contributing plan lines. The summary points to the exact spending decision that needs review.
Budget vs Actual ranks the gap between planned and recorded actual spend by cost center. A reader can open a cost center to see the contributing plan lines. Use the plan version and dates to keep a comparison tied to the same planning decision; a ranked total alone cannot explain which spend category drove the gap.
How the work is organized
- Comparison. FP&A Planner starts in Budget vs Actual and opens a cost center from the ranked summary.
- Source line. The planner checks planned amount, actual amount and variance on the contributing lines.
- Decision. Finance Leader reviews the same plan version before asking for an explanation.
What to agree during setup
Agree which plan version and period represent the approved comparison, and who enters actual amounts on plan lines. Keep the organization and cost center names consistent so the same spend is not split across labels.
Choose the plan and version used for each review and agree who enters the actual amount on its lines. Keep cost center spelling consistent across lines. Check that the totals shown in the ranked comparison reconcile to the opened lines before presenting a difference to Finance Leader.
Check the handoff on an actual case
Take a cost center whose actual amount exceeds its plan amount. Open it from the ranked list and inspect the spend categories and line descriptions. Ask the planner to explain the line driving the gap; Finance Leader can then decide whether the plan needs a new version or whether the variance belongs in the operating review.
FP&A Planner opens the ranked cost center and traces the gap to the Software line. Finance Leader checks that line’s amount and actual amount against the plan version in review. If the apparent variance comes from a line assigned to another plan, correct its reference and rerun the comparison before discussing the result.
What your team sees
- Budget vs Actual — Ranks cost center differences and opens their source plan lines.
- Approved Plans — Shows approved plan versions for a later spending review.
Follow the work through
See the related process for the operating sequence. Use the data model to check references before importing records and roles to agree who can act.
What it keeps track of
Data model- Plans
- Budget and forecast plan headers with period, owner, version and approval status.
- Plan lines
- Cost center budget and forecast lines with quantity, unit rate and amount.
Who uses it
Permissions- FP&A Planner
- Investigates the ranked difference and its plan lines.
- Finance Leader
- Decides what follow-up the variance needs.
- Admin
- Maintains the organization and owner references.
Set up Financial Planning & Analysis your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.