1. Ghost Kitchen Aggregator
  2. Features
  3. Kitchen partners
Feature · Kitchen partners

Kitchen partners

Keep partner coverage and source mappings tied to the organization that uses them.

OverviewPartner Coverage
Ghost Kitchen Aggregator · Kitchen partners

Partner Coverage

Kitchen partners

New
CodeNameEffective fromEffective toPolicy referenceOrganization
CDE-508Partner 79215 Oct20 OctPR-783ORG-3815
CDE-123Partner 83309 Oct18 OctPR-162ORG-5438
CDE-700Partner 37007 Oct11 OctPR-110ORG-6888
CDE-134Partner 82610 Oct12 OctPR-327ORG-8334
CDE-932Partner 78308 Oct17 OctPR-345ORG-2491
6 of 6 records
CDE-508Kitchen partners · KP-17490
Active
NamePartner 792
Effective from15 Oct
Effective to20 Oct
Policy referencePR-783
OrganizationORG-3815
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Keep partner coverage and source mappings tied to the organization that uses them

A partner feed changes a source field while an older order remains open. The coordinator checks the effective mapping version and policy reference for that partner, then records which definition the order uses. Existing orders retain their linked definition. The work starts with partner code, organization and active state. Those details let the next person open the same order or partner context instead of relying on a message thread. The team then checks effective dates, policy reference and feed mapping version. The important decision is whether the partner definition used by an order is effective for its operating date.

The records here separate an operating fact from its review. An order can have a status, an observation can have an outcome, and a run can have an execution result. Each answers a different question. When the team sees an inactive partner or mapping with the wrong effective date, it keeps the partner policy reference and source mapping beside the source order so a later reviewer can reconstruct what happened.

How the work is organized

  • Identify the source. Start from partner code, organization and active state and keep the related organization, partner and order visible.
  • Check the decision. Review effective dates, policy reference and feed mapping version before the order moves to the next status or a result is used.
  • Keep the trail. Record the partner policy reference and source mapping with the same source identity when a question needs investigation.

What to agree during setup

Agree who maintains each partner code, active period and policy reference within an organization. Kitchen Coordinator should review source and target fields, mapping version and effective date before an order uses the definition. Keep the source snapshot coverage period available for feed investigations.

Give the Kitchen Coordinator a partner with a known code and effective date. Walk through an accepted case and an inactive partner or mapping with the wrong effective date. Check that the person responsible for the next step can find the linked source record and its current status. Keep earlier revisions, outcomes and reasons available when the team investigates a change.

Check the handoff on an actual case

A partner feed changes a source field while an older order remains open. The coordinator checks the effective mapping version and policy reference for that partner, then records which definition the order uses. Existing orders retain their linked definition. Ask Order Operator to open the order and name its linked partner definition. Kitchen Coordinator should show which mapping version covered its order date. If the feed changes a field, keep the older mapping visible while the new version is reviewed.

Rehearse the case with a returned or uncertain outcome as well. The team should keep that result visible, assign an action with a due date where needed, and close the action with a resolution that points back to the order. The order trail should still show what happened before the correction.

What your team sees

  • Partner Coverage — Check partner coverage, effective dates and policy references before routing.
  • Source Coverage Schedule — Review source-system coverage dates and freshness for partner feed work.

Follow the work through

Follow the worked process and agree the implementation sequence before the first operating cycle.

What it keeps track of

Data model
Kitchen partners
Kitchen partner definitions, effective policies, and active coverage.
Source mappings
Reviewed source-to-target mappings for kitchen partner feeds.
Organizations
Authorized operating organizations and reporting scope.
Source snapshots
Captured source-system coverage and freshness evidence.

Who uses it

Permissions
Kitchen Coordinator
, Admin and Metrics Analyst.
The first named role owns the daily handoff; the others review the context or investigate exceptions.

Set up Ghost Kitchen Aggregator your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started