Production review

Production Reviewer checks each production record for the date, quantity, unit and grade, then records the accepting team member. The result belongs to a specific cycle, which in turn belongs to a pasture. This chain lets Pasture Manager compare planned timing, completed field work and actual recorded output without treating an observation estimate as produced quantity.

More than one record may be needed when output is collected at different times or grades. Each record should carry the actual date and its own unit. A summary by cycle makes sense only after quantities with different units have been kept separate. The reviewer should inspect the source event before accepting a record; a cycle status change alone cannot establish a produced quantity.

• Identify the source. Link output to the cycle for the pasture where the work occurred.
• Record the result. Enter the actual production date, quantity, unit and grade.
• Name the reviewer. Preserve the team member who accepted the result on the record.

Production Records support both operational review and reporting. The accepted-by link is important because it lets the team distinguish a field entry from a reviewed result. Pasture Manager should reconcile production with completed tasks, especially when a cycle reaches Harvesting or Closed. Closing a cycle should not erase a later correction or the identity of the earlier reviewer.

Agree which physical event creates a production record, who enters it and who may be the accepting reviewer. Decide how the farm grades output and which units are permitted for each product. Define the correction path for a wrong quantity or date; a repeated import or repeated human entry must not be counted as additional production. Choose a reporting cutoff so late entries are recognizable.

The team also needs a rule for partial output. A paddock can yield at more than one date. Each portion should have its own recorded evidence and reviewer. Pasture Manager can then assess whether the cycle is truly ready to close rather than inferring completion from one accepted portion.

Start with a cycle in Harvesting and two completed field tasks. Enter a production result with the actual date, quantity, unit and grade. Production Reviewer compares it with the field evidence and records acceptance. Open Production History and confirm that the cycle and reviewer are visible. Pasture Manager checks whether more work or another portion is expected before closing the cycle.

Repeat with a second portion in another unit. Keep it separate in review and reporting. Finally, present a field observation containing an estimated value and ask the reviewer to distinguish it from the produced quantity. This practical case protects the production total from an attractive but incorrect shortcut.

• Production History — Dated accepted results with cycle, quantity, unit, grade and reviewer.
• Cycle Board — The current cycle stage beside the output review.

Use production review and pasture planning to connect the result to the next cycle.