1. Patch Management System
  2. Features
  3. Patch catalog
Feature · Patch catalog

Patch catalog

Identify the release before recording work against an asset.

OverviewPatches by severity
Patch Management System · Patch catalog

Patches by severity

Patch catalog

New
Patch IDPatch titleProductVersionSeverityReleased at
PI-210High pc-429PRD-712Rev AHigh05 Oct
PI-860Critical pc-604PRD-209Rev BCritical05 Oct
PI-207High pc-140PRD-874Rev CHigh20 Oct
PI-523Critical pc-540PRD-407Rev DCritical25 Oct
PI-761High pc-815PRD-415Rev EHigh07 Oct
6 of 6 records
PI-210Patch catalog · PC-33510
High
Patch titleHigh pc-429
ProductPRD-712
VersionRev A
Released at05 Oct
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Start with a recognizable release

The patch catalog records the identifier and title a team uses to recognize a release. Product and version give the operator context before selecting an asset. Severity helps the change reviewer decide which work to examine first, while the release date distinguishes an older release from a newly available one. These fields describe the patch. They do not say that any particular asset has received it.

Suppose an operating system update affects a service the team considers important. Admin records the patch ID, title, product, version, severity and release date. A Patch Operator checks those details before creating an attempt against an assigned asset. If the product or version differs from the intended release, the operator corrects the catalog selection before the attempt is recorded. That simple check prevents the attempt history from being attached to the wrong release.

How the work is organized

  • Catalog identity. Keep the patch ID and title meaningful to the team that will review the attempt later.
  • Release context. Product, version and release date tell the operator which release the record represents.
  • Severity. Use the recorded severity to prioritize review without treating it as an installation result.

What to agree during setup

Agree who maintains the catalog and where patch details originate. An external advisory feed or scanner can supply candidates through a connection, but someone still needs to decide which record represents the release the team intends to use. Agree on how the team writes product and version names so duplicates are easy to spot. Also decide when a new release deserves a separate record instead of rewriting an older one that already has attempts linked to it.

Patch severity belongs to the release record. Service criticality belongs to the service record. A high severity release affecting a lower criticality service may need a different work window from the same release affecting a critical service. Keep those judgments in the change review, where the service context and rollback plan are visible.

Check the handoff on an actual case

Choose one catalog entry and one asset. Confirm that the operator can read the intended patch ID, product and version before making an attempt. Then open the attempt and confirm it points back to that catalog entry. Try a second asset for the same patch: the two attempts should remain separate, while the release identity stays shared. Review an older release as well so a new version does not obscure earlier attempt outcomes.

What your team sees

  • Patches by severity — Review high and critical releases with their product, version and release date.
  • Scheduled patch attempts — See which selected releases have an attempt marked Scheduled for an asset.

Follow the work through

What it keeps track of

Data model
Patch catalog
Patch Catalog for patch planning and service operations.
Patch attempts
Patch Attempts for patch planning and service operations.
Assets
Assets for patch planning and service operations.

Who uses it

Permissions
Admin
, Patch Operator, Change Manager.

Set up Patch Management System your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started