Questions, answered

Click Get started, then use Proto to configure QMS for Electronics Manufacturing for your business. Start with one inspection type, a named inspector and reviewer, and a real failed-check case that can be followed into containment.

An inspection records its subject, type, schedule, assignee and status. Linked checks carry requirements, observations, results and evidence for the review decision.

Inspector submits the inspection at Review with its check evidence. At Review, Quality Reviewer checks failed scope and opens a linked nonconformance in Containment before deciding the inspection outcome.

Yes. Capture board serial, revision, reference designator and defect code against an inspection, then send the attributed observation for disposition.

Each check records its workstation, date, resistance and lower and upper limits. An out-of-limits reading is Fail and goes to quality review; an in-limits reading remains Pass.

The corrective action references the nonconformance, which references the inspection. Its owner records root cause, action and due date. The independent reviewer examines effectiveness evidence before closure.

Independent Reviewer accepts effectiveness after the owner submits the action for review. Quality Manager approves the action plan before implementation.

Yes. Findings stay under their audit with requirement, observation, severity, owner and due date. Audit status and finding closure are reviewed separately.

A training acknowledgment connects a person with a controlled document and the date acknowledged. Keep document versions distinct so the record identifies what the person received.

Rehearse a passing inspection, a failed inspection with check evidence, an ESD Fail, a board disposition and a corrective action whose effectiveness needs independent review.