1. Research Management System
  2. Features
  3. Expenses and review
Feature · Expenses and review

Expenses and review

Trace program claims from draft to reviewed payment status.

OverviewExpenses Awaiting Review
Research Management System · Expenses and review

Expenses Awaiting Review

Approval conditions

New
ProgramExpense dateCategoryAmountEvidenceStatus
PRG-858903 OctCTG-997600EVD-371Review
PRG-810420 OctCTG-66950EVD-974Review
PRG-784118 OctCTG-933130EVD-543Review
PRG-687607 OctCTG-505940EVD-922Review
PRG-622206 OctCTG-408250EVD-570Review
6 of 6 records
CTG-997Expenses · EXP-52716
Review
ProgramPRG-8589
Expense date03 Oct
Amount600
EvidenceEVD-371
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Expenses and review

The Finance Officer records each program expense with a date, category, amount and evidence attachment. Draft, Review, Approved, Paid and Rejected are distinct statuses. A claim can be ready for review without being approved, and an approved claim can still be waiting for its payment status to be recorded.

How the work is organized

  • Prepare the claim. The Finance Officer links it to a program and records the date, category, amount and attachment.
  • Decide eligibility. The Reviewer compares the attachment and category with the linked program and its award restrictions before recording Approved or Rejected.
  • Record payment later. The Finance Officer changes an approved claim to Paid after confirmation from the agreed finance source.

An expense claim for a project purchase is linked to the funded program. The Finance Officer attaches the receipt and places it in review. The Reviewer compares the expense category and amount with the program and its award restrictions. Approval records the eligibility decision. The Finance Officer records Paid only when the payment step has been confirmed in the agreed finance process.

What to agree during setup

Agree how expense categories map to the funder restrictions and who may approve claims. Keep review and payment responsibilities distinct. Decide how a rejected claim is corrected or resubmitted and what evidence must remain attached. If payment is handled elsewhere, agree the source of the payment confirmation before recording Paid.

Plan the first operating cycle before using these records for reporting.

Check the handoff on an actual case

Pick a claim in Review with evidence and a restrictive award. Ask the Reviewer to explain why the claim qualifies. Follow its program link, decision and later payment status. Repeat with an unsupported claim and confirm it remains rejected rather than appearing in approved or paid totals.

For a monthly review, open the expense list beside the active award for that program. Separate claims still in Review from claims already Approved, and ask the Finance Officer which approvals have a confirmed payment status. The claim amount is the amount under review; the award amount remains the sponsor commitment. Keeping the two figures in their own records makes a later reconciliation easier to explain to the program owner.

What your team sees

  • Expenses Awaiting Review — Lists claims at Review with their program, amount and evidence.
  • Expense status board — Separates draft, review, approved and rejected claims for finance follow-up.

Follow the work through

What it keeps track of

Data model
Expenses
Program expense claims with category, amount, evidence and review status.
Programs
Sponsored research programs with owner, period, budget and lifecycle status.
Funding awards
Funder awards attached to a program, with amount, award date, restrictions and status.

Who uses it

Permissions
Finance Officer
, Reviewer and Program Officer work from the same linked records, with review decisions assigned to the appropriate person.
See roles and permissions.

Set up Research Management System your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started