Questions, answered

Click Get started, then use Proto to configure Soil Testing Lab System for your business. Begin with a known field sample, its receipt inspection and the people who will capture results and review the quality evidence.

Record the sample number, field reference and depth in centimeters with collection and receipt dates. Link the sample to its operational inspection before preparing analyte entries.

Record the analyte, unit and method with the intended sample and reviewing person. Keep those details visible when the laboratory examines or compares results.

The Inspector resolves all linked checks with their observations, results and evidence before submitting the inspection. Pending checks need resolution under the guarded conduct procedure.

Configure the Quality Reviewer to decide eligible Review-stage work. The reviewer examines the supporting checks and accepts passing scope or rejects failed scope through the disposition procedure.

Rejected scope produces a linked nonconformance for the failed requirement under the disposition workflow. The team inspects that issue and coordinates containment and corrective work as needed.

Action Owner submits implementation evidence and an independent Quality Reviewer evaluates effectiveness. Only an accepted outcome closes the action, and the parent nonconformance closes only when all linked actions have accepted outcomes.

Document Coordinator prepares the intended title, version and effective date for review. Preserve earlier version context and record staff acknowledgment against the document they were asked to read.

Set up the chosen instrument or result-source connection during implementation. Map sample identity, units and methods, then rehearse invalid references and repeated source entries before importing further results.