Yield grading

Yield grading records the grade, accepted weight, rejected weight and unit against the exact harvest. The reference lets Agronomy Reviewer follow the measured outcome to that harvest and its crop cycle. Field Operator captures evidence through the authorized grading command, while Agronomy Reviewer manages the recorded grade detail.

The command validates evidence before saving and refreshes the linked crop cycle’s harvest detail. A repeated harvest and grade returns the original record. Agree a separate correction procedure when a measurement changes. The team needs to distinguish recovery of a saved submission from a new decision about the measured output.

• Harvest selection. Choose the exact harvest before recording a grade. Check its crop cycle, actual date, quantity and unit. Similar crop descriptions and repeated harvest dates need enough context for the operator to identify the intended source.
• Weight detail. Keep accepted and rejected weights in the declared unit. Agree grade labels before reviewing totals. Compare grading with the harvested quantity only when the measurement basis agrees, and leave unexplained differences visible for Agronomy Reviewer to investigate.
• Repeated submission. Use the same harvest and grade when recovering the original command result. Review the returned record before submitting anything else. Agree who handles a mistaken weight and how the original evidence remains understandable after a correction.

Name the person who records weights and agree what evidence Agronomy Reviewer expects. Define grade labels and permitted units with the farm’s own working examples. Keep those conventions consistent across harvest entry, grading and review. Decide how the team handles mixed units before they appear together in an output discussion.

Configure the grading command for the intended Field Operator account and rehearse it separately from general grade-record management. Agronomy Reviewer manages the recorded evidence. Test the command with valid and invalid weights, and agree how the reviewer investigates a difference against harvested quantity. Keep the actual result and source references available when the operator needs help recovering a submission.

For a rehearsal, choose a harvest recorded as 300 kilograms. Capture a grade with 270 kilograms accepted and 30 kilograms rejected. Submit through the authorized command, open the saved grade and follow its harvest reference back to the intended crop cycle. Agronomy Reviewer compares the combined weights with the harvest quantity in the same unit before drawing an output conclusion.

Repeat the same harvest and grade and confirm that the original record is returned. Test an unauthorized account and invalid grading evidence, then compare the grade and linked cycle detail before and after refusal. If the farm needs to correct the saved weight, rehearse that procedure separately with Agronomy Reviewer. Recovering a repeated submission should preserve the earlier result rather than quietly replace it.

• Yield Grade Detail — Grade evidence with its harvest, accepted weight, rejected weight and unit.
• Rejected Yield Weight — Grade records with positive rejected weight for reviewer follow-up.

Use yield evidence to season review and confirm the preceding harvest acceptance decision with its reviewer.