These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- GRC for Banking and Financial Services
- Features
- Independent retests
Independent retests
Use a separate reviewer and fresh evidence to decide whether a finding can close.
OverviewAction owner queue×
GRC for Banking and Financial Services · Independent retests
New
Action owner queue
Corrective actions
| Id | Finding | Due at | Completed at | Status | Owner | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDD-439 | FND-8199 | 03 Oct | Planned | |||
| IDD-546 | FND-7256 | 23 Oct | In progress | |||
| IDD-292 | FND-8434 | 19 Oct | Submitted | |||
| IDD-174 | FND-3828 | 15 Oct | Verified | |||
| IDD-893 | FND-7697 | 09 Oct | Planned |
6 of 6 records
IDD-439Corrective actions · CA-86332
PlannedFindingFND-8199
Due at03 Oct
What you can do
Make closure a fresh examination
An action owner can submit a correction, but that submission is not the finding outcome. A retest records who reviewed the finding, when they tested, the result and the supporting evidence. Pass, Fail and Inconclusive keep the decision explicit. A passing retest can support closing the finding and verifying the action; the other results leave the finding open for further work.
For a control that failed during a lending assessment, the Remediation Owner may revise the procedure and submit proof of adoption. The Independent Reviewer selects a fresh sample, records what was examined and decides whether the corrected control operated as intended. The reviewer must be a different person from the corrective action owner. The first failed test remains part of the history even if the retest later passes.
How the work is organized
- Submitted work. Start from the corrective action and its linked finding.
- Separate reviewer. Record the team member who performed the retest.
- Decision evidence. Retain the tested date, result and explanation for closure or another cycle.
What to agree during setup
Agree how a reviewer is chosen, what makes a retest independent and how much evidence is needed for each result. The reviewer should have access to the original assessment and tested control while being prevented from certifying their own corrective action. Determine how the team handles an inconclusive outcome, including whether more evidence or a different sample is needed.
Make the status sequence understandable. The finding can move to Retest while the action is Submitted, but neither label is proof of success. Only a passing independent examination justifies Closed on the finding and Verified on the corrective action. Report readers should be able to distinguish awaiting review, reviewed but failed and successfully verified work.
Check the handoff on an actual case
Take a submitted action with its source finding and an original failed test. Assign a reviewer who did not own the action. The reviewer records a dated retest, evidence and a Fail result. Confirm the finding stays open. Repeat with an Inconclusive result and confirm it still needs attention. Finally, enter a supported Pass and inspect the resulting finding and action states.
Attempt the same retest as the corrective action owner. It should be refused. A second delivery of an already accepted retest operation should return the same outcome, not create another closure. Ask the Assessment Owner to reconstruct the chain from the original test to the independent result without changing the earlier evidence.
What your team sees
- Corrective actions submitted — Find actions ready for a separate reviewer.
- Open findings — Distinguish issues awaiting retest from those still being remediated.
Follow the work through
What it keeps track of
Data model- Retests
- Independent retests that decide whether a finding may be closed.
- Findings
- Findings raised from failed or inconclusive control testing.
- Corrective actions
- Remediation actions assigned to a finding owner with due dates and evidence.
- Team members
- Named people who own, prepare and independently review work.
- Assessment tests
- Individual control tests executed under an assessment.
Who uses it
Permissions- Independent Reviewer
- , Remediation Owner, Assessment Owner, Admin.
Set up GRC for Banking and Financial Services your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.