1. Impact Measurement Platform
  2. Features
  3. Goals and organizations
Feature · Goals and organizations

Goals and organizations

Set the organizational goal behind each impact program.

OverviewPrograms ready for review
Impact Measurement Platform · Goals and organizations

Programs ready for review

Impact programs

New
NumberNameOrganizationOwnerRevisionObservation date
IP-92743Program 713ORG-422816010 Oct
IP-31115Program 657ORG-510866007 Oct
IP-96068Program 311ORG-551885018 Oct
IP-72376Program 538ORG-159194007 Oct
IP-53498Program 870ORG-471586022 Oct
6 of 6 records
Program 713Impact programs · IP-92743
Validated
OrganizationORG-4228
Revision160
Observation date10 Oct
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Start with the goal that owns the work

An impact program needs a clear organizational home and a defined theory-of-change goal. The Admin maintains the organization code and name. The Impact Measurement Platform Administrator records the goal under that organization. The goal carries its own code, effective dates and policy reference. Program owners can then select that goal when they define a program, keeping the intended outcome visible next to observations and later decisions.

This context matters when several organizations report similar outcomes. A program’s organization and definition are separate references. Reviewers can see both before deciding whether the evidence belongs to the program at hand. An active flag on organizations and goals helps the team distinguish current context from a record kept for history.

How the work is organized

  • Organization identity. Agree a stable code and name for each organization before program entry starts.
  • Goal period. Record when the goal applies and the policy reference that explains its use.
  • Program link. Select the intended goal on the program rather than repeating its wording in free text.

The Admin owns organization setup; the Impact Measurement Platform Administrator owns the goal record. Operators read that context while preparing programs. Reviewers and analysts use it to interpret outcomes, not to change the goal after an observation has been submitted.

What to agree during setup

Choose an organization code that survives a display-name change. Agree whether departments should be distinct organizations or share one owner. Record the goal code, effective period and policy reference used by the reporting team. Decide who can mark a goal active and how a replaced goal will be identified for programs already in progress. These decisions make comparisons by definition meaningful across later reporting cycles.

Prepare a small sample of programs under different goals. Verify that each program’s organization agrees with the organization that owns its selected goal. If an incoming source uses a different goal label, document its field mapping before people import observations. The mapping record has a definition reference and an effective date so its interpretation can be checked later.

Check the handoff on an actual case

A department records a goal for its service program with a stable code, effective dates and policy reference. The operator starts an impact program, assigns its owner and selects the department and that goal. An observation arrives with a source identifier and a measured value. The reviewer checks the goal’s identity alongside the program and the observation before recording a decision against the program revision. The analyst can later group reported values by the goal reference rather than by an informal title typed on each line.

If a second department uses similar language for a different goal, its separate organization and code keep its programs distinct. The operator can still work from the same program screen while the organization reference preserves the reporting boundary.

What your team sees

  • Programs in collection — Programs with their organization, goal, owner and observation date.
  • Program status board — Program status and goal context for the selected reporting work.

Follow the work through

Define and collect starts with the goal reference. Review the revision shows how that context reaches the reviewer.

What it keeps track of

Data model
Organizations
Agencies, departments and organizations that own theory-of-change goals and impact programs.
Theory of change goals
Published theory-of-change goals and outcome targets owned by an organization.
Source mappings
Reviewed field mappings and transform rules between source payloads and target fields.
Impact programs
Impact programs recorded for an organization against a theory-of-change goal.

Who uses it

Permissions
Admin
, Impact Measurement Platform Administrator, Impact Measurement Platform Operator, Impact Measurement Platform Reviewer, Read Only Analyst.
Admin
Maintains organizations; the Impact Measurement Platform Administrator maintains goals.
The other roles use that context to prepare, review or read results.

Set up Impact Measurement Platform your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started