These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- Legal Hold Management
- Features
- Matters and conflicts
Matters and conflicts
Give every preservation question a clear engagement and clearance context.
OverviewMatters in conflict review×
Legal Hold Management · Matters and conflicts
New
Matters in conflict review
Matters
| Record number | Subject | Status | Counterparty | Owner | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTT-66986 | Conflict Review mtt-207 | Conflict Review | CLN-8085 | ||
| MTT-79967 | Conflict Review mtt-374 | Conflict Review | CLN-9551 | ||
| MTT-70733 | Conflict Review mtt-378 | Conflict Review | CLN-7036 | ||
| MTT-55103 | Conflict Review mtt-847 | Conflict Review | CLN-6860 | ||
| MTT-55254 | Conflict Review mtt-200 | Conflict Review | CLN-9158 |
6 of 6 records
Conflict Review mtt-207Matters · MTT-66986
Conflict ReviewCounterpartyCLN-8085
What you can do
Give every preservation question a clear engagement and clearance context
A matter begins with a record number, subject, organization, owner and counterparty. The matter owner records the engagement reference and jurisdiction when they are relevant, then keeps the matter status current. A conflict reviewer records the decision, date, reviewer and evidence against that same matter. A clear decision supports the next engagement step; a conflict or request for more information keeps the question visible for the owner.
How the work is organized
- Identify the parties. Matter Owner checks the organization, counterparty and record number on the intake matter.
- Record clearance. Conflict Reviewer keeps the decision, evidence, date and reviewer with that matter.
- Advance deliberately. The owner enters the engagement reference only after a Clear decision; More Information calls for follow-up.
A Clients record belongs to an organization, and the matter references that record as its counterparty. This matters when the same organization handles several engagements with different parties. The owner should use the record number consistently in conversation and imported material so an attachment or deadline is never attached to a similarly named matter.
What to agree during setup
Decide how organizations and counterparties are identified before bringing in open matters. The matter links its counterparty to a Clients record; it has no separate client-engagement field. Assign a Matter Owner for each record and agree that More Information or Conflict is not clearance. Rehearse a similar-name counterparty case, then confirm the Conflict Reviewer records the decision on the correct matter before engagement changes.
Check the handoff on an actual case
Suppose a new request concerns a former client. The matter owner opens the intake record with the counterparty and jurisdiction. The conflict reviewer checks the parties and records More Information with the supporting evidence. The owner gathers the missing context before the reviewer records a later clearance decision. Only then does the owner record the engagement reference and advance the matter.
Ask a different Matter Owner to open the case by record number, inspect the counterparty and read the conflict evidence. They should explain why More Information did not permit engagement and identify the later Clear decision if the matter advanced. Keep the review date and reviewer’s name with the decision.
What your team sees
- Active matter register — Matters ready for ongoing work, with their owner and counterparty.
- Matters in conflict review — Intake records awaiting a clearance decision.
Follow the work through
What it keeps track of
Data model- Matters
- Legal matters and engagements
- Clients
- Client entities engaged by the organization
- Conflict reviews
- Conflict clearance records for involved parties
- Organizations
- Firm organizations that own clients, matters and holds
- Team members
- Authenticated staff members and their role scope
Who uses it
Permissions- Matter Owner
- , Conflict Reviewer and Admin work from the same matter context with different decision rights.
- Check roles and permissions before assigning live access.
Set up Legal Hold Management your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.