These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- Litigation Management
- Features
- Court deadlines
Court deadlines
Track submitted revisions, attorney decisions and filing completion.
OverviewCourt deadlines awaiting attorney review×
Litigation Management · Court deadlines
New
Court deadlines awaiting attorney review
Approval conditions
| Parent | Court | Due at | Filing reference | Revision | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTT-85565 | CRT-698 | 20 Oct | FR-270 | 860 | Submitted | |
| MTT-79703 | CRT-424 | 21 Oct | FR-243 | 820 | Submitted | |
| MTT-46688 | CRT-111 | 04 Oct | FR-753 | 90 | Submitted | |
| MTT-67085 | CRT-342 | 18 Oct | FR-895 | 810 | Submitted | |
| MTT-40719 | CRT-861 | 05 Oct | FR-845 | 400 | Submitted |
6 of 6 records
CRT-698Court deadlines · CD-51521
SubmittedParentMTT-85565
Due at20 Oct
Filing referenceFR-270
Revision860
What you can do
Connect the due date to filing evidence
A court deadline is more than a calendar date. It names the matter and organization, the court, the due date and the filing reference used to reconcile completion. The coordinator prepares a revision for review. The supervising attorney checks it against the court calendar and the actual filing receipt before deciding whether the record is ready to complete.
How the work is organized
A draft gives the coordinator room to verify the court and calculate days remaining. Submission identifies the revision presented to counsel. A decision on a different revision should not silently clear the changed deadline. Keep the attorney’s decision date and the operation receipt with the matter, so a completed label can be traced to the filing evidence. If reconciliation fails, keep the exception available for investigation.
- Check the court source. Confirm the due date and court before treating a prepared record as reliable.
- Review the submitted revision. Counsel decides against a specific version of the deadline.
- Reconcile completion. The filing reference and operation receipt explain the final result.
What to agree during setup
Decide who monitors the court calendar, who enters deadline revisions and which receipt constitutes filing evidence. Prepare an ordinary filing and one whose filing reference does not match the retained evidence. Rehearse a due-date correction after submission so the attorney sees the changed revision. Establish a method for reviewing failed operation receipts before staff rely on the completion state.
Check the handoff on an actual case
A coordinator records a filing deadline for an active matter and submits the current revision. The attorney compares the court, due date, days remaining and filing reference with the calendar and filing receipt. If those details agree, the attorney records the decision on that revision. The completion record can then be reconciled with an operation receipt.
Suppose the court changes the due date after the coordinator submitted the earlier revision. The team updates the deadline and submits the new revision for review. The earlier decision should still explain the earlier facts; it does not settle the new date. A reviewer can identify the matter, court and latest decision without guessing from the status label alone.
What your team sees
- Open court deadlines — Draft, submitted and approved deadlines needing attention.
- Court deadlines awaiting attorney review — Submitted revisions for counsel to decide.
- Completed court filings — Completion records with filing and decision references.
Follow the work through
Follow the filing review and review operational exceptions. Prepare the implementation with actual court and receipt examples.
What it keeps track of
Data model- Court deadlines
- Court deadline extensions and verified filing completion.
- Matters
- Litigation matters from intake through closure.
- Review decisions
- Independent attorney review decisions on frozen revisions.
- Operation receipts
- Persisted receipts for every guarded operational action.
- Organizations
- Firm or legal department organizations that own matters.
Who uses it
Permissions- Matter Coordinator
- , Supervising Attorney, Auditor.
- The coordinator prepares the deadline; the attorney verifies the court evidence and decides; the auditor can inspect the retained trail.
Set up Litigation Management your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.