1. Municipal Corporation ERP
  2. Features
  3. Reporting and history
Feature · Reporting and history

Reporting and history

Explain case progress, review decisions and exceptions from linked records.

OverviewCase State History
Municipal Corporation ERP · Reporting and history

Case State History

Case state history

New
SourceFrom statusTo statusOccurred atSource revisionActor
CSS-81863FS-151TS-87916 Oct130
CSS-16869FS-211TS-81426 Oct930
CSS-41105FS-482TS-72112 Oct810
CSS-35306FS-267TS-21521 Oct320
CSS-62704FS-856TS-91605 Oct380
6 of 6 records
FS-151Case state history · CSH-96689
SourceCSS-81863
To statusTS-879
Occurred at16 Oct
Source revision130
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Read the result with its history

A case’s current status is only a starting point for an explanation. The submission and completion dates show the case’s timeline. The service definition, organization and assignee identify its scope. Requirement outcomes, verified documents and decision revisions explain why the work advanced, returned or stopped. Case state history retains transitions with an actor, time, source revision and reason.

The Reports screen supports the team in reviewing authorized results. Cases and Details is useful when a total needs an explanation: select the case, inspect its state history and read the related decision and operation trace. The analyst can study trends without changing operational records. Operators and reviewers can go back from an exception to the particular case they need to address.

How the work is organized

  • Case population. Group results by service and current status, then keep the underlying cases available for review.
  • Decision trail. Read a decision with its reviewer, date, reason and source revision.
  • Execution exceptions. Trace a failed run through its steps and attempts before counting delivery as complete.

What to agree during setup

Agree which organizations and public services belong in each operating review. Decide whether a report uses the submission date, completion date or both, and be explicit about cases still open at the review cutoff. A delivered status and a delivery reference answer different questions; the team should check both when reviewing completion. Decide who can see case-level evidence and who receives only authorized aggregates.

For a weekly review, group cases by service and status. Look at submitted cases that have stayed open, then check their pending requirements or reviewer decisions. Compare delivered cases’ submission and completion dates, and inspect a delayed example. An open follow-up with a due date should be discussed as unresolved work, even if a related case once reached a later status.

Check the handoff on an actual case

Take a case shown in a service summary and locate its number in Case Status Board. Open Case State History to read when it moved from Submitted to Verified and from Verified to Decided. Compare the decision’s source revision with the case revision. Check its requirement outcomes and supporting document verification. If the case was delivered, compare its completion date and delivery reference with its operation result.

For an exception, open Failed Runs and Execution Exceptions. The operation key and step trace help the team distinguish repeated attempts from separate work. A report should lead the operator to an assigned next action and give the reviewer enough context to decide a new revision when one is required. Keep earlier decisions available in the case history after a correction.

What your team sees

  • Case State History — Each recorded transition with actor and revision.
  • Case Status Board — A status summary that leads to the selected case’s history and detail.
  • Delivered Cases — Completed cases with delivery references for follow-up review.

Follow the work through

What it keeps track of

Data model
Cases
Requests, applications and cases submitted for a public service.
Case requirements
Observation-level requirement, document and line detail captured against a service application.
Case documents
Uploaded and verified supporting documents and source evidence.
Decisions
Independent reviewer decisions recorded against an exact source revision.
Follow up actions
Assigned outstanding actions, corrections and outstanding requests for a case.
Case state history
Immutable workflow-written status transition history for each case.
Operation runs
Workflow-maintained execution runs with operation key, input hash and persisted result reference.
Operation steps
Ordered steps inside an operation run with input, output and external receipt state.
Execution attempts
Each recorded attempt to execute an approved action for a service application.
Public services
Published service definitions, programmes and entitlements offered by an organization.
Organizations
Agencies, departments and service organizations that own public services and cases.
People
Staff, officers, reviewers and assigned team members.

Who uses it

Permissions
Read Only Analyst
Reviews authorized summaries and aggregates.
Municipal Corporation ERP Operator
Resolves assigned case exceptions.
Municipal Corporation ERP Reviewer
Explains and records decisions.
Municipal Corporation ERP Administrator
Maintains the service context used to group results.

Set up Municipal Corporation ERP your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started