These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- Municipal Corporation ERP
- Features
- Reporting and history
Reporting and history
Explain case progress, review decisions and exceptions from linked records.
OverviewCase State History×
Municipal Corporation ERP · Reporting and history
New
Case State History
Case state history
| Source | From status | To status | Occurred at | Source revision | Actor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSS-81863 | FS-151 | TS-879 | 16 Oct | 130 | ||
| CSS-16869 | FS-211 | TS-814 | 26 Oct | 930 | ||
| CSS-41105 | FS-482 | TS-721 | 12 Oct | 810 | ||
| CSS-35306 | FS-267 | TS-215 | 21 Oct | 320 | ||
| CSS-62704 | FS-856 | TS-916 | 05 Oct | 380 |
6 of 6 records
FS-151Case state history · CSH-96689
SourceCSS-81863
To statusTS-879
Occurred at16 Oct
Source revision130
What you can do
Read the result with its history
A case’s current status is only a starting point for an explanation. The submission and completion dates show the case’s timeline. The service definition, organization and assignee identify its scope. Requirement outcomes, verified documents and decision revisions explain why the work advanced, returned or stopped. Case state history retains transitions with an actor, time, source revision and reason.
The Reports screen supports the team in reviewing authorized results. Cases and Details is useful when a total needs an explanation: select the case, inspect its state history and read the related decision and operation trace. The analyst can study trends without changing operational records. Operators and reviewers can go back from an exception to the particular case they need to address.
How the work is organized
- Case population. Group results by service and current status, then keep the underlying cases available for review.
- Decision trail. Read a decision with its reviewer, date, reason and source revision.
- Execution exceptions. Trace a failed run through its steps and attempts before counting delivery as complete.
What to agree during setup
Agree which organizations and public services belong in each operating review. Decide whether a report uses the submission date, completion date or both, and be explicit about cases still open at the review cutoff. A delivered status and a delivery reference answer different questions; the team should check both when reviewing completion. Decide who can see case-level evidence and who receives only authorized aggregates.
For a weekly review, group cases by service and status. Look at submitted cases that have stayed open, then check their pending requirements or reviewer decisions. Compare delivered cases’ submission and completion dates, and inspect a delayed example. An open follow-up with a due date should be discussed as unresolved work, even if a related case once reached a later status.
Check the handoff on an actual case
Take a case shown in a service summary and locate its number in Case Status Board. Open Case State History to read when it moved from Submitted to Verified and from Verified to Decided. Compare the decision’s source revision with the case revision. Check its requirement outcomes and supporting document verification. If the case was delivered, compare its completion date and delivery reference with its operation result.
For an exception, open Failed Runs and Execution Exceptions. The operation key and step trace help the team distinguish repeated attempts from separate work. A report should lead the operator to an assigned next action and give the reviewer enough context to decide a new revision when one is required. Keep earlier decisions available in the case history after a correction.
What your team sees
- Case State History — Each recorded transition with actor and revision.
- Case Status Board — A status summary that leads to the selected case’s history and detail.
- Delivered Cases — Completed cases with delivery references for follow-up review.
Follow the work through
Review delivery and follow-up and the reports reference.
What it keeps track of
Data model- Cases
- Requests, applications and cases submitted for a public service.
- Case requirements
- Observation-level requirement, document and line detail captured against a service application.
- Case documents
- Uploaded and verified supporting documents and source evidence.
- Decisions
- Independent reviewer decisions recorded against an exact source revision.
- Follow up actions
- Assigned outstanding actions, corrections and outstanding requests for a case.
- Case state history
- Immutable workflow-written status transition history for each case.
- Operation runs
- Workflow-maintained execution runs with operation key, input hash and persisted result reference.
- Operation steps
- Ordered steps inside an operation run with input, output and external receipt state.
- Execution attempts
- Each recorded attempt to execute an approved action for a service application.
- Public services
- Published service definitions, programmes and entitlements offered by an organization.
- Organizations
- Agencies, departments and service organizations that own public services and cases.
- People
- Staff, officers, reviewers and assigned team members.
Who uses it
Permissions- Read Only Analyst
- Reviews authorized summaries and aggregates.
- Municipal Corporation ERP Operator
- Resolves assigned case exceptions.
- Municipal Corporation ERP Reviewer
- Explains and records decisions.
- Municipal Corporation ERP Administrator
- Maintains the service context used to group results.
Set up Municipal Corporation ERP your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.