1. Aerospace and Defense QMS
  2. Features
  3. Corrective actions
Feature · Corrective actions

Corrective actions

Keep root cause, approved action, owner and effectiveness review attached to a nonconformance.

OverviewDue for effectiveness review
Aerospace and Defense QMS · Corrective actions

Due for effectiveness review

Corrective actions

New
NonconformanceRoot causeActionDue dateStatusOwner
NNC-2379RC-668ACT-90303 OctEffectiveness review
NNC-7591RC-659ACT-40218 OctEffectiveness review
NNC-4560RC-345ACT-29610 OctEffectiveness review
NNC-4896RC-647ACT-38914 OctEffectiveness review
NNC-9572RC-158ACT-63115 OctEffectiveness review
6 of 6 records
RC-668Corrective actions · CA-11287
Effectiveness review
NonconformanceNNC-2379
ActionACT-903
Due date03 Oct
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Follow the action back to the finding

Corrective action begins with a linked nonconformance. The action record keeps a root cause, action plan, owner, due date and status. Quality Manager can see the work that is planned, being implemented or due for effectiveness review. The parent link matters: a closed action should answer the specific nonconformance that prompted it, rather than serve as a general task completion note.

For a rejected incoming inspection, Quality Manager describes the defect on the nonconformance and assigns an action owner. The owner records the root cause and planned correction. After the action enters its approved state, the owner implements it and records completion. At effectiveness review, the workflow checks the retained cause and action. The parent nonconformance closes only after all linked actions meet the close condition.

How the work is organized

  • Cause and plan. The action keeps the reason, proposed work and due date with its parent nonconformance.
  • Ownership. A named person carries the assigned work through implementation.
  • Effectiveness. The effectiveness workflow checks retained action details before the action and its parent can close.

What to agree during setup

Agree what belongs in the root cause and action fields for the team’s common defects. Decide who owns implementation when the inspected part came from another team, and how the owner will record completion. Define what the team will inspect alongside the retained cause and action during effectiveness review. The due date should describe the commitment for the corrective action, not simply the date the defect was detected.

Agree how several actions under one nonconformance are handled. The close condition checks every linked corrective action. A parent cannot be treated as resolved because one owner has finished while another linked action is still earlier in its lifecycle. Quality Manager can use the effectiveness queue to keep that distinction visible.

Check the handoff on an actual case

Create a nonconformance from a rejected inspection and link a corrective action. Enter a concrete root cause and action, assign the owner and set a due date. Move the complete plan into its approved state, then implement it and record completion. At the effectiveness stage, confirm the workflow checks the retained cause and action and closes the parent only when all linked actions satisfy the condition.

Repeat with a second linked action still implementing. The parent should remain open until the second action reaches the required review or closed state. This test makes the dependency understandable to everyone who reads the status list.

What your team sees

  • Due for effectiveness review — Actions waiting for a decision on completed work.
  • Overdue corrective actions — Due dates and owners to discuss in the quality review.
  • Open nonconformances — Parent cases still under containment, investigation or disposition.

Follow the work through

Nonconformance to correction covers the close condition. Reports shows the due date and status questions.

What it keeps track of

Data model
Corrective actions
Corrective and preventive actions linked to a nonconformance, with root cause, action plan and effectiveness review.
Nonconformances
Nonconformances raised from inspections, with severity, containment, investigation and disposition state.
Inspections
Quality inspections for aerospace and defense programs: incoming, in-process, final and service verification of parts and assemblies.
People
QMS people directory: quality managers, inspectors, auditors and approvers, each linked to their platform user.

Who uses it

Permissions
Quality Manager
Follows the corrective work.
Quality Approver
Can read the action and source inspection evidence.
Inspector
Can trace the outcome back to the inspected case.

Set up Aerospace and Defense QMS your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started