These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- Teacher Performance Mgmt
- Features
- Observation reviews
Observation reviews
Teacher observations with rubric score and development plan.
OverviewDraft observation reviews×
Teacher Performance Mgmt · Observation reviews
New
Draft observation reviews
Approval conditions
| Id | Parent | Teacher | Observed at | Rubric score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDD-459 | TCK-15716 | TCH-669 | 17 Oct | 50 | |
| IDD-608 | TCK-58513 | TCH-921 | 15 Oct | 75 | |
| IDD-315 | TCK-51047 | TCH-816 | 19 Oct | 25 | |
| IDD-147 | TCK-81021 | TCH-549 | 20 Oct | 40 | |
| IDD-919 | TCK-39569 | TCH-273 | 27 Oct | 90 |
6 of 6 records
IDD-459Observation reviews · OR-62396
ParentTCK-15716
TeacherTCH-669
Observed at17 Oct
Rubric score50
What you can do
Record the observation and the plan that follows it
An observation review records the teacher who was observed, when, the rubric score and the development plan agreed with them. It belongs to the observation request it answers. The observer drafts it, attaches the supporting evidence (lesson notes, observation forms, a video reference) to the request, and submits it.
Submission checks the review against the request: the teacher, observation time, rubric score and development plan must be present and consistent with the evidence and events already on the request. The submitted revision is then frozen. An independent instructional reviewer approves, rejects or returns it, and only approved reviews count in the program’s reports. The observer cannot approve their own review.
How the work is organized
Observers draft and submit; instructional reviewers decide.
- Teacher, time, score and plan. All four are needed before submission.
- Evidence on the request. Supporting files are attached where the reviewer can see them.
- Independent approval. Reviews are decided by someone other than the observer.
What to agree during setup
Agree your rubric and how scores are recorded, what a development plan must include, and what evidence each observation needs. Agree who reviews observations and how returned reviews are handled. Prepare examples of an approved review, a review returned for a missing development plan and a review rejected because the evidence did not support the score.
Check the handoff on an actual case
After observing the science lesson, the coach drafts a review with a rubric score of 2.8 and a development plan focused on questioning techniques, attaching the observation form. The reviewer returns it because the plan has no follow-up date. The coach adds one and resubmits, and the reviewer approves. The teacher’s approved observation and plan now appear in the program’s records.
Across the year, each teacher’s approved reviews build a record of scores and plans that the program and the teacher can both see.
What your team sees
- Draft observation reviews — Reviews still being written.
- Observation reviews awaiting decision — Submitted reviews for the reviewer.
- Observation review board — Reviews by status.
Follow the work through
- Observation review approval: From draft to approved review.
What it keeps track of
Data model- Observation reviews
- Teacher classroom observation reviews supporting approval.
- Tickets
- Observation and support tickets opened for a campus.
- Record attachments
- Evidence files attached to a ticket or review.
Who uses it
PermissionsSet up Teacher Performance Mgmt your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.