1. Teacher Performance Mgmt
  2. Features
  3. Observation reviews
Feature · Observation reviews

Observation reviews

Teacher observations with rubric score and development plan.

OverviewDraft observation reviews
Teacher Performance Mgmt · Observation reviews

Draft observation reviews

Approval conditions

New
IdParentTeacherObserved atRubric score
IDD-459TCK-15716TCH-66917 Oct50
IDD-608TCK-58513TCH-92115 Oct75
IDD-315TCK-51047TCH-81619 Oct25
IDD-147TCK-81021TCH-54920 Oct40
IDD-919TCK-39569TCH-27327 Oct90
6 of 6 records
IDD-459Observation reviews · OR-62396
ParentTCK-15716
TeacherTCH-669
Observed at17 Oct
Rubric score50
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Record the observation and the plan that follows it

An observation review records the teacher who was observed, when, the rubric score and the development plan agreed with them. It belongs to the observation request it answers. The observer drafts it, attaches the supporting evidence (lesson notes, observation forms, a video reference) to the request, and submits it.

Submission checks the review against the request: the teacher, observation time, rubric score and development plan must be present and consistent with the evidence and events already on the request. The submitted revision is then frozen. An independent instructional reviewer approves, rejects or returns it, and only approved reviews count in the program’s reports. The observer cannot approve their own review.

How the work is organized

Observers draft and submit; instructional reviewers decide.

  • Teacher, time, score and plan. All four are needed before submission.
  • Evidence on the request. Supporting files are attached where the reviewer can see them.
  • Independent approval. Reviews are decided by someone other than the observer.

What to agree during setup

Agree your rubric and how scores are recorded, what a development plan must include, and what evidence each observation needs. Agree who reviews observations and how returned reviews are handled. Prepare examples of an approved review, a review returned for a missing development plan and a review rejected because the evidence did not support the score.

Check the handoff on an actual case

After observing the science lesson, the coach drafts a review with a rubric score of 2.8 and a development plan focused on questioning techniques, attaching the observation form. The reviewer returns it because the plan has no follow-up date. The coach adds one and resubmits, and the reviewer approves. The teacher’s approved observation and plan now appear in the program’s records.

Across the year, each teacher’s approved reviews build a record of scores and plans that the program and the teacher can both see.

What your team sees

  • Draft observation reviews — Reviews still being written.
  • Observation reviews awaiting decision — Submitted reviews for the reviewer.
  • Observation review board — Reviews by status.

Follow the work through

See roles.

What it keeps track of

Data model
Observation reviews
Teacher classroom observation reviews supporting approval.
Tickets
Observation and support tickets opened for a campus.
Record attachments
Evidence files attached to a ticket or review.

Who uses it

Permissions
Observer
, Instructional Reviewer.
Observer
S write reviews; reviewers decide them.

Set up Teacher Performance Mgmt your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started