These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- Business Process Modeler
- Features
- Process Models
Process Models
Own each process revision from draft through review and publication.
OverviewPublished models×
Business Process Modeler · Process Models
New
Published models
Process models
| Number | Name | Revision | Cycle minutes | Completed at | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM-45196 | Model 302 | 580 | 45 | Published | ||
| PM-49205 | Model 321 | 70 | 20 | Published | ||
| PM-95939 | Model 813 | 920 | 85 | Published | ||
| PM-64055 | Model 464 | 500 | 110 | Published | ||
| PM-49798 | Model 592 | 600 | 15 | Published |
6 of 6 records
Model 302Process models · PM-45196
PublishedRevision580
Cycle minutes45
What you can do
Give every model an accountable owner
A process model brings together the business name, owning organization, simulation scenario and current revision. The Process Owner decides what the model is meant to represent and when the draft is ready for validation. The Model Designer describes the work in nodes, while the owner keeps the model’s current status clear to everyone reviewing it.
Consider an order handoff that passes from intake to a specialist team. The team records the handoff as ordered nodes under one model. If the intake assumption changes, the Simulation Operator can work from a later revision while the earlier revision and its recorded result remain available for comparison. The model number and revision keep those results from being treated as the same run.
How the work is organized
- Ownership. The model names its organization and owner so questions about scope have a clear destination.
- Revision. A revision identifies the exact version validated, reviewed and used for a simulation.
- Lifecycle. Draft, Validated, Simulated, Reviewed and Published distinguish preparation from completed decisions.
What to agree during setup
Choose a naming convention for models, how a revision number changes and which person can move a reviewed result toward publication. Decide what a simulation date means for the team’s operating cycle. Agree which scenario is effective for a revision and who may alter that link. The organization should also decide how to refer to earlier process work in the predecessor field.
Assign separate people to prepare and independently review a revision. A Process Owner can request validation, but the Independent Reviewer must see the exact revision and evidence behind the result. Set the review threshold before teams begin comparing cycle times. A changed assumption should be visible as a changed scenario or revision, not hidden in a narrative result.
Check the handoff on an actual case
Start with a draft model for an intake process. Add its owning organization, owner and scenario. Ask the Model Designer to map the intake and specialist handoff as ordered nodes. Validate that revision and inspect the resulting run and pending review decision. Have the Independent Reviewer record a decision against that revision before the Simulation Operator starts the simulation.
After the run, compare the result with the draft’s intended path. If the work changes, create a successor revision and retain the previous execution record. Confirm that the Published status belongs to the reviewed revision the Process Owner intended. The important handoff is from a named owner to a reviewable revision, then to a result that can be traced back to the same source.
What your team sees
- Model revision workboard — Move across the active lifecycle while keeping the owner and revision visible.
- My process models — Find the revisions assigned to you for preparation and follow-up.
- Published models — Inspect the current reference and its recorded cycle time.
Follow the work through
Follow validation and review before simulation execution. Use implementation to set ownership and revision rules.
What it keeps track of
Data model- Process models
- Process model revisions with their organization, owner, simulation scenario and lifecycle status.
- Organizations
- Operating organizations that own automation definitions and action connectors.
- People
- Operators, reviewers and owners who prepare, execute and review automation work.
- Simulation scenarios
- Simulation scenarios that define the arrival assumptions and effective policy basis for process models.
- State history
- Immutable status transition history for each automation definition.
Who uses it
Permissions- Process Owner
- , Model Designer, Independent Reviewer, Simulation Operator, Admin.
Set up Business Process Modeler your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.