These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- Citizen Service Portal
- Features
- Corrections
Corrections
A delivered application can need a documented correction.
OverviewVerified Applications×
Citizen Service Portal · Corrections
New
Verified Applications
Service applications
| Number | Name | Revision | Status | Owner | Definition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA-49963 | Application 664 | 750 | Verified | PS-2793 | ||
| SA-79788 | Application 182 | 730 | Verified | PS-6259 | ||
| SA-84675 | Application 322 | 310 | Verified | PS-4145 | ||
| SA-34280 | Application 395 | 860 | Verified | PS-8821 | ||
| SA-47558 | Application 590 | 850 | Verified | PS-3448 |
6 of 6 records
Application 664Service applications · SA-49963
VerifiedRevision750
DefinitionPS-2793
What you can do
Corrections in daily work
A delivered application can need a documented correction. The correction workflow preserves the earlier revision, completed operation steps, evidence and decisions. It creates a successor revision for independent review and a compensating follow-up action when delivery is superseded. The original delivery reference and completed steps remain readable after a change. The correction workflow creates a successor revision with a Pending review decision and a compensating follow-up when delivery is superseded.
How the work is organized
- Prepare the case. A case was delivered, then an operator finds a source detail that changes the outcome. The operator documents the reason, links a follow-up action to the application and sends the successor revision to a reviewer. The previous delivery reference and operation trace remain available to explain what happened first.
- Keep a named owner. The operator documents why the delivered result must change and inspects the earlier action before preparing the successor.
- Preserve the trace. The earlier decision, evidence and completed steps stay with the case so the reviewer can distinguish them from the new revision.
What to agree during setup
Agree who can start a correction, how a reason is written and who owns compensating work. A correction must be distinguishable from routine editing of a Draft case. Decide how staff will reconcile any external action already carried out before the replacement decision is acted on. Agree who can start a correction and how its reason identifies the earlier delivery. Name the person who owns compensating work and when it is due. Rehearse an external action that already completed before the replacement decision is reviewed.
Check the handoff on an actual case
Start from one delivered case and read its state history. Follow the earlier review decision and operation steps, then inspect the successor revision and its Pending decision. The follow-up should identify an assignee and due date. Confirm that the original action remains traceable after the new review. Start with a Delivered application and locate its earlier decision, run and completed steps. Then inspect the successor revision and Pending decision. Ask the assigned person to explain the compensating follow-up without changing the earlier action.
What your team sees
- Open Follow Ups — Find corrective actions with an assignee and due date.
- My Follow Ups — See the assigned person’s own correction work.
Follow the work through
See executed revision correction for successor review and execution reconciliation for an uncertain earlier result.
What it keeps track of
Data model- Service applications
- Requests, applications and cases submitted for a public service.
- State history
- Immutable workflow-written status transition history for each case.
- Review decisions
- Independent reviewer decisions recorded against an exact source revision.
- Follow up actions
- Assigned outstanding actions, corrections and outstanding requests for a case.
Who uses it
Permissions- Citizen Service Portal Operator
- , Citizen Service Portal Reviewer.
- The operator documents the correction and owns follow-up; the reviewer independently decides on its successor revision.
Set up Citizen Service Portal your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.