These cookies are required for the website to function properly. They ensure security, enable basic features like page navigation, and store user session data. You cannot disable these cookies.
- Gaming Studio Project Mgmt
- Features
- Evidence and decisions
Evidence and decisions
Retain delivery files and independent decisions against the exact work package revision.
OverviewReview Decision Register×
Gaming Studio Project Mgmt · Evidence and decisions
New
Review Decision Register
Review decisions
| Parent | Source revision | Decision | Reviewer | Decided at | Reason | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WP-97904 | 20 | Approve | 17 Oct | Approve rd-337 | ||
| WP-98292 | 660 | Return | 12 Oct | Reject rd-291 | ||
| WP-54631 | 830 | Approve | 15 Oct | Return rd-499 | ||
| WP-74868 | 860 | Return | 14 Oct | Approve rd-689 | ||
| WP-82996 | 460 | Approve | 06 Oct | Reject rd-899 |
6 of 6 records
Approve rd-337Review decisions · RD-83110
ApproveParentWP-97904
Source revision20
Decided at17 Oct
What you can do
Evidence and decisions in daily work
Retain delivery files and independent decisions against the exact work package revision. The team uses evidence type, visibility, source revision, decision, reason, and reviewer to keep that context together. Use a pilot package to check the record links and each role’s handoff.
How the work is organized
- Evidence. Contributor attaches a titled file to the package with an evidence type, uploader, date, and visibility setting.
- Decision. Independent Reviewer records a decision, reason, source revision, and reviewer against the same package.
- Handoff. Project Coordinator checks returned work and asks for review against the current revision before acceptance.
An attachment’s Internal or Shared setting is an access decision, not proof that the file supports delivery. The reviewer reads the task completion and attachment in context. A prior decision remains useful history even when a changed package needs a fresh one.
What to agree during setup
Agree which evidence types support each delivery step and who may mark an attachment Shared. Define how the reviewer checks completed tasks and related files. Require the reviewer to be independent of package ownership, and keep the decision reason specific enough for the coordinator to act on a Return or Reject. A decision on an older source revision does not authorize acceptance of the current package.
Independent Reviewer records the decision and reason against the inspected source revision. Project Coordinator addresses a returned decision before requesting another review.
Check the handoff on an actual case
Consider a delivery candidate with completed tasks but a missing build file. Contributor uploads the file to the correct package and sets its visibility under the studio’s rule. Independent Reviewer checks the source revision, task completion, and attached file, then records Return with a reason if the evidence remains incomplete. Project Coordinator corrects the handoff and requests another decision against the current revision.
Repeat after the package revision changes. The earlier decision stays in the register, but the new revision must have its own independent review. Check that the reviewer cannot approve a package they own and that a file linked to another package is not accepted as this delivery’s evidence.
What your team sees
- Review Decision Register — Read decisions, source revisions, reviewers, and reasons.
- Work Package Review Queue — Find packages in review and inspect their current evidence.
Follow the work through
Follow planning, execution, and delivery review for the handoffs that connect these records. The data model shows the exact references to migrate and verify. Set up a pilot through implementation before broadening the team.
What it keeps track of
Data model- Record attachments
- Evidence files linked to work packages with explicit visibility.
- Review decisions
- Independent reviewer decisions for work-package revisions.
- Work packages
- Operational work packages moving through planning, execution, review, and acceptance.
- Tasks
- Scoped work-package task rows with estimates, dependencies, and completion evidence.
Who uses it
Permissions- Independent Reviewer
- Makes the package decision.
- Contributor
- Records evidence; Project Coordinator resolves returned work and checks the current revision.
Set up Gaming Studio Project Mgmt your way.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.