1. Labor Law Compliance
  2. Features
  3. Retests and review
Feature · Retests and review

Retests and review

Record independent results and reviewer decisions

OverviewRetest results
Labor Law Compliance · Retests and review

Retest results

Retests

New
FindingReviewerTested atResultEvidence
FND-799914 OctPassEVD-678
FND-826505 OctFailEVD-555
FND-277219 OctInconclusiveEVD-551
FND-907324 OctPassEVD-655
FND-300210 OctFailEVD-856
6 of 6 records
EVD-678Retests · RTS-47848
Pass
FindingFND-7999
Tested at14 Oct
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Retests and review in the working cycle

Review decisions and retests answer different questions. A review decision records whether an assessment revision is approved, rejected or returned, with a reviewer, decision date and reason. A retest checks whether work on a finding has changed the observed result. Both need enough context for another person to understand what was examined and what remains open.

When an assessment reaches review, the Compliance Manager presents its tests, findings and attachments. The reviewer records the source revision and decision. If information needs correction, a return or rejection keeps that decision visible. An approval belongs to the reviewed revision. A later change should come back through review rather than silently inheriting the earlier judgment.

After a Remediation Owner submits evidence, the Retest Reviewer tests the finding independently. They record the test date, result and evidence on the retest. A failed or inconclusive result directs the team back to the finding and action. A passing result supports verification, while the Compliance Manager remains responsible for the broader assessment closure decision. For example, an updated time-record process may be documented by the owner, then sampled again by a separate reviewer before the finding is closed.

How the work is organized

  • Revision decision. Keep the source revision, reviewer, reason and decision on the assessment.
  • Independent check. Record the retest against the original finding and its corrective evidence.
  • Closure context. Read decisions and retests together before closing the assessment.

What to agree during setup

Agree who may review an assessment revision and who is independent enough to retest an action. Set the evidence needed for approval and what a returned decision asks the owner to change. Define when a passing retest is sufficient to verify an action and when the finding needs another step. Keep the review reason specific to the case.

Check the handoff on an actual case

Use an assessment with a finding and a submitted action. Have one reviewer decide the assessment revision and another person perform the retest. Return a revision once, then check that the later approval refers to the revision actually reviewed. Enter an inconclusive retest and confirm the team can still see the unresolved issue. Finish with a passing result and review the full trail.

What your team sees

  • Retest results — Dated retest results with reviewer and finding.
  • Assessment review inbox — Assessment revisions awaiting a decision.
  • Actions awaiting verification — Submitted corrective actions awaiting verification.

Follow the work through

Follow the related process, review the data model and agree implementation steps with the team.

What it keeps track of

Data model
Retests
Independent retest of a remediated finding.
Review decisions
Independent reviewer decisions on submitted revisions.
Findings
Test exceptions raised as findings for remediation.
Corrective actions
Assigned remediation work with due dates and evidence.
Assessments
Wage-hour, OSHA and classification assessments with scope and lifecycle.

Who uses it

Permissions
Retest Reviewer
, Compliance Manager, Legal Reviewer.

Set up Labor Law Compliance your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started