1. Food and Beverage QMS
  2. Features
  3. Allergen verification
Feature · Allergen verification

Allergen verification

Record line cleaning and swab outcomes when production changes from one product to another.

OverviewAllergen swabs awaiting review
Food and Beverage QMS · Allergen verification

Allergen swabs awaiting review

Approval conditions

New
Operational recordLinePrevious allergenNext productCleaned atSwab result
INS-40240LNE-851PA-636NP-12515 OctPending
INS-32734LNE-896PA-896NP-99120 OctPending
INS-89045LNE-283PA-533NP-48406 OctPending
INS-71684LNE-192PA-194NP-25505 OctPending
INS-11934LNE-419PA-335NP-74904 OctPending
6 of 6 records
LNE-851Allergen verifications · AV-78929
Pending
Operational recordINS-40240
Previous allergenPA-636
Next productNP-125
Cleaned at15 Oct
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Give the changeover a traceable result

An allergen verification identifies the line, previous allergen, next product, cleaning date and swab result. It links to an inspection, so the team can read the changeover alongside the broader quality work for that operating subject. The swab result moves through Pending, Pass or Fail as the evidence is reviewed.

Suppose a line changes from a product containing an allergen to a product with a different formulation. The Quality Inspector records the line, the previous allergen, the next product and when cleaning was done. The capture workflow validates the inspection link and changeover context, then submits the swab evidence for a responsible reviewer decision. Quality Manager can work through pending results before treating the inspection as complete.

How the work is organized

  • Changeover context. The prior allergen and next product explain why the check exists.
  • Inspection link. The operational inspection carries the assignee, subject and eventual disposition.
  • Swab outcome. Pending keeps undecided evidence visible; Pass and Fail record the result.

A passing swab is one piece of an inspection. A failed swab calls for review of the inspection and the team’s production handoff. A rejected inspection can then connect to a nonconformance for containment and investigation. That path lets reviewers recover the original line and product change from the quality record.

What to agree during setup

Choose a stable way to name lines, allergens and products. Decide when the cleaning date is entered, who records the swab result, and who has authority to decide on pending evidence. Agree how a failed result is communicated to the line and how the inspection review reflects that outcome. These decisions should use the actual production changeover sequence rather than a generic checklist.

Agree how the quality decision reaches the production team. If a downstream production system must receive a hold or release decision, include that connection in the implementation plan and verify it using a real changeover case.

Check the handoff on an actual case

Walk through a specific line change with a named prior allergen and next product. Have the inspector open the relevant inspection and record the cleaning details. Leave the swab result Pending, then ask the Quality Manager to find it in the pending list and review the evidence. Record a Pass case and a Fail case. For the failure, follow the inspection through rejection and containment so the team sees how the changeover evidence remains attached to the decision.

What your team sees

  • Allergen swabs awaiting review — Pending changeover results with line and product context.
  • Inspections in review — The inspection decision that considers the changeover result.

What it keeps track of

Data model
Allergen verifications
Allergen Verifications records for Quality & Compliance (Source).
Inspections
Inspections records for Quality & Compliance (Source).
Nonconformances
Nonconformances records for Quality & Compliance (Source).
People
People records for Quality & Compliance (Source).

Who uses it

Permissions
Quality Inspector
Records the changeover and swab.
Quality Manager
Decides the result in the inspection context.
Corrective Action Owner
Handles a linked rejected inspection.

Set up Food and Beverage QMS your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started