1. Safety / Incident Reporting
  2. Features
  3. Corrective Actions
Feature · Corrective Actions

Corrective Actions

Assign a finding response, record evidence and prepare verification.

OverviewMy corrective actions
Safety / Incident Reporting · Corrective Actions

My corrective actions

Corrective actions

New
Due atCompleted atEvidenceStatusFindingOwner
22 OctEVD-658PlannedFND-6730
15 OctEVD-469In progressFND-6727
13 OctEVD-883SubmittedFND-3587
23 OctEVD-148VerifiedFND-5727
04 OctEVD-302PlannedFND-3220
6 of 6 records
EVD-658Corrective actions · CA-72320
Planned
Due at22 Oct
FindingFND-6730
Example screen with sample data

What you can do

Give the finding a responsible owner

A Corrective Action links to the finding it addresses. The Action Owner receives a due date, records the remediation evidence and enters a completion date when the work is done. Planned, in progress, Submitted and Verified distinguish assignment from work, submission and accepted verification. The finding remains a separate account of the control gap.

Suppose a failed test shows that a site control was not followed. The Safety Manager opens a finding and assigns an Action Owner to change the local practice. The owner records what was changed and supplies evidence. Submission asks for a check; it does not itself establish that the fix worked. A separate retest records the observed outcome against the finding. The investigation holds a corrective-action description; the action record links to the finding.

How the work is organized

  • Assignment. Due date and owner make the response accountable.
  • Evidence. The completed work has a dated explanation for review.
  • Verification. The retest result supports a Verified action and finding closure.

The action’s status and finding’s status answer different questions. A Submitted action can still have a finding awaiting retest. A failed or inconclusive retest should keep the gap visible and lead the owner to revise the response. Keep both the original due date and actual completion date available when reviewing how long the response took.

At the weekly handoff, the Safety Manager can compare due work with submitted work and ask each owner what evidence is still needed. That conversation should use the linked finding, not a separate personal task list.

What to agree during setup

Agree who may assign an action, who is qualified to retest and what evidence is sufficient. Set due dates that reflect the finding’s severity and operating circumstances. Decide how to handle a failed or inconclusive retest and when the action can be marked Verified. Make the review decision independent of the person who performed the correction.

Check the handoff on an actual case

Start from an Open finding tied to a failed control test. Assign the action, record the response and move it to Submitted. Ask the Independent Reviewer to inspect the evidence and perform a retest. Check whether a Pass result supports verification and whether a Fail or Inconclusive result leads to more work. The Safety Manager should see the finding, action and retest together before closing the matter.

What your team sees

  • My corrective actions — Due work assigned to the current owner.
  • Submitted corrective actions — Completed responses awaiting an independent check.
  • Retest outcomes — Results tied back to the original finding.

Follow the work through

Follow finding to action for assignment and action verification for the retest.

What it keeps track of

Data model
Corrective actions
Remediation work assigned to a finding owner
Findings
Control failures or gaps raised by testing
Retests
Independent retest of a finding after remediation
Assessment tests
Individual control tests with sample size, exceptions and evidence
Team members
Named people holding safety roles inside an organization

Who uses it

Permissions
Action Owner
, Independent Reviewer, Safety Manager.

Set up Safety / Incident Reporting your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started