Connects to the tools you use
Set up connections through ERP.AI and Proto workflows, with every change logged.
- Vendor IT Security Assessment
- Vendor response handoff
- Staff identities
- Evidence files
Vendor IT Security Assessment keeps vendor questionnaires and control responses alongside inspection, audit and remediation records. A questionnaire names the vendor, owner, version and due date.
Inspections in one list
The Reviewer decides whether to accept or reject the inspected scope.
Every feature works on the same records. Pick one to see the screen your team works in.
Keep each vendor request, owner, due date and review decision together.
Approval conditions
| Vendor name | Version | Due date | Owner | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Ridge Hosting annual assessment | Version 1.2 | 16 Oct | Nina Patel | Review | |
| Bluehaven Payroll intake review | Version 2.0 | 21 Oct | Mei Tan | Review | |
| Northline Analytics renewal review | Version 2.1 | 18 Oct | Sanjay Rao | Review | |
| Willow Gate Support access review | Version 3.0 | 14 Oct | Olivia Grant | Review | |
| Slatebridge Storage security review | Revision 4 | 01 Nov | Leila Nasser | Review |
Read control answers with their evidence and risk rating.
Security answers
| Control code | Answer | Evidence | Risk rating | Questionnaire | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAM-01 | MFA enforced for production admins | admin_mfa_export_oct2026.pdf | High | Northline Analytics renewal review | |
| BCP-04 | Restore test completed in September | restore_test_sep2026.pdf | Critical | Northline Analytics renewal review | |
| IAM-07 | Access reviews occur each quarter | access_review_q3_2026.xlsx | High | Northline Analytics renewal review | |
| ACC-03 | Support uses named accounts | support_accounts_oct2026.csv | Critical | Willow Gate Support access review | |
| ENC-05 | Keys rotate every twelve months | key_rotation_log_2026.pdf | High | Alder Point Software annual review |
Assign a security inspection and keep each control result with it.
Approval conditions
| Inspection number | Subject reference | Inspection type | Completed at | Assigned to | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INS-56868 | Cedar Ridge Hosting admin access | Incoming | Jonas Weber | Review | ||
| INS-49427 | Bluehaven Payroll data processing | In Process | Leila Nasser | Review | ||
| INS-95029 | Northline Analytics backup service | Final | Sanjay Rao | Review | ||
| INS-79777 | Willow Gate Support remote portal | Service | Leila Nasser | Review | ||
| INS-10180 | Slatebridge Storage encryption | Incoming | Theo Martins | Review |
Track failed inspection scope into containment and corrective work.
Corrective actions
| Nonconformance | Owner | Action | Completed at | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Badge revocation exceeded policy | Amina Yusuf | Enforce MFA for all admin users | Effectiveness Review | ||
| Incident notice clause absent | Karim Haddad | Complete witnessed restore test | Effectiveness Review | ||
| MFA missing for vendor admin accounts | Amina Yusuf | Obtain access review signoff | Effectiveness Review | ||
| MFA missing for vendor admin accounts | Amina Yusuf | Disable shared support account | Effectiveness Review | ||
| Badge revocation exceeded policy | Sanjay Rao | Rotate production encryption keys | Effectiveness Review |
Plan audit scope and follow each finding to its owner and due date.
Audit findings
| Audit | Requirement | Finding | Severity | Owner | Due date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinecrest payment security audit | MFA required for privileged access | Two admin accounts have no MFA | Observation | Sanjay Rao | 17 Oct | |
| Cedar Ridge annual controls audit | Annual backup restore test | No witnessed restore in current year | Minor | Elias Moreno | 23 Oct | |
| Alder Point change control audit | Quarterly user access review | Review sheet lacks owner signature | Major | Karim Haddad | 19 Oct | |
| Northline data handling audit | Unique accounts for remote support | Shared login used by support team | Observation | Jonas Weber | 14 Oct | |
| Slatebridge resilience audit | Annual encryption key rotation | Key last rotated 15 months ago | Minor | Sanjay Rao | 17 Oct |
Keep policy versions and person-level acknowledgment records.
Approval conditions
| Title | Version | Effective date | Document | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party access policy | Version 1.2 | 01 Nov | third_party_access_policy_v2.pdf | Review | |
| Vendor assessment procedure | Version 2.0 | 23 Oct | vendor_assessment_procedure_v3.pdf | Review | |
| Security incident escalation policy | Version 2.1 | 01 Nov | incident_escalation_policy_v1.pdf | Review | |
| Evidence retention standard | Version 3.0 | 01 Nov | evidence_retention_standard_v2.pdf | Review | |
| Privileged access review procedure | Revision 4 | 16 Oct | privileged_access_review_v4.pdf | Review |
Inspection to corrective action ships ready to use. 2 steps need a named approval before the work moves on: Review inspection (Reviewer) and Check effectiveness (Reviewer).
Name the subject, type, date and assigned Inspector.
Record each requirement's result, observation and evidence.
The Reviewer examines the checks and decides the outcome.
Describe a failure and link it to the inspection.
Give the corrective work an owner and due date.
The Reviewer checks whether the action addressed the original failure.
Open any inspection to see its inspection checks, the roles that work on it, its process stages and its approvals on one page.
Scheduled at, Assigned to and Status.
Each line is linked to this inspection.
Admin, Inspector and Reviewer, each with their own permissions.
Plan inspection and Capture checks, with the role that acts.
Review inspection and Check effectiveness, with who decides.
Incoming
| Requirement | Observation | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| MFA required for privileged access | Two dormant admins still enabled | admin_mfa_export_oct2026.pdf |
| Annual backup restore test | Restore evidence omits database tier | restore_test_sep2026.pdf |
| Quarterly user access review | One reviewer signature missing | access_review_q3_2026.xlsx |
Signed in as Reviewer
| Decision | Approver | |
|---|---|---|
| Review inspectionThe Reviewer examines the checks and decides the outcome. | Reviewer | |
| Check effectivenessThe Reviewer checks whether the action addressed the original failure. | Reviewer | |
| Approve Inspections, security questionnaires | Reviewer |
Everyone opens Vendor IT Security Assessment to the work that is theirs. Pick a role to see what it starts with.
Maintains access and the people used for assignment.
Runs assigned inspections and captures control evidence.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Inspections · Inspector
Decides inspection and questionnaire outcomes and assesses elevated control risk.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Security questionnaires · Reviewer
| Vendor name | Version | Due date | Owner | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Ridge Hosting annual assessment | Version 1.2 | 24 Oct | Mei Tan | Draft | |
| Bluehaven Payroll intake review | Version 2.0 | 25 Oct | Amina Yusuf | Draft | |
| Northline Analytics renewal review | Version 2.1 | 23 Oct | Karim Haddad | Draft | |
| Willow Gate Support access review | Version 3.0 | 24 Oct | Nina Patel | Draft | |
| Slatebridge Storage security review | Revision 4 | 24 Oct | Elias Moreno | Draft |
Owns vendor questionnaire follow-up and due dates.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Security questionnaires · Assessment Owner
| Vendor name | Version | Due date | Owner | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Ridge Hosting annual assessment | Version 1.2 | 24 Oct | Mei Tan | Draft | |
| Bluehaven Payroll intake review | Version 2.0 | 25 Oct | Amina Yusuf | Draft | |
| Northline Analytics renewal review | Version 2.1 | 23 Oct | Karim Haddad | Draft | |
| Willow Gate Support access review | Version 3.0 | 24 Oct | Nina Patel | Draft | |
| Slatebridge Storage security review | Revision 4 | 24 Oct | Elias Moreno | Draft |
Investigates linked nonconformances and records corrective work.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Nonconformances · Corrective Action Owner
Plans audit work and records findings for an engagement.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Audits · Auditor
Maintains controlled security documents and acknowledgment records.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Controlled documents · Document Controller
| Title | Version | Effective date | Document | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party access policy | Version 1.2 | 01 Nov | third_party_access_policy_v2.pdf | Review | |
| Vendor assessment procedure | Version 2.0 | 23 Oct | vendor_assessment_procedure_v3.pdf | Review | |
| Security incident escalation policy | Version 2.1 | 01 Nov | incident_escalation_policy_v1.pdf | Review | |
| Evidence retention standard | Version 3.0 | 01 Nov | evidence_retention_standard_v2.pdf | Review | |
| Privileged access review procedure | Revision 4 | 16 Oct | privileged_access_review_v4.pdf | Review |
Review vendor decisions, elevated answers, inspection results and follow-up work.
This quarter
How far records got this quarter
| Stage | Reached | Step | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planned | 31 | ||
| In Progress | 7 | 23% | |
| Review | 1 | 14% | |
| Accepted | 1 | 100% |
Sample counts per stage
Group vendor questionnaires by status, owner and due date.
List high and critical answers with their questionnaire and evidence.
Compare inspection status, type, subject and assigned person.
Show failed checks under each inspection with requirement and observation.
Group open nonconformances by severity, inspection and detection date.
Show action status and due date by owner and linked nonconformance.
Show findings, severity and due date beneath each audit.
Show people and acknowledgment dates under each controlled document.
See how Vendor IT Security Assessment fits your kind of team.
Each stage of inspection to corrective action names the role that acts and the status it records, so a change is never anonymous.
Each stage, the role that acts and the status it records
Give your team focused help with review preparation and follow-up.
Set up connections through ERP.AI and Proto workflows, with every change logged.
Every record lives in a table you can see, extend and export. Add fields or whole tables in Proto.
Browse all 12 tablesStart with one team and one process, then add the rest once the basics are running.
Choose a vendor questionnaire and an inspection subject that the team can work end to end. Define control codes, required checks and decision authority.
Connect staff identities to People, assign the Inspector and Reviewer, and load the current assessment procedure with its version and effective date.
Create the questionnaire, answers, inspection and checks with real evidence. Confirm every child record points to the correct parent.
Submit a complete inspection for review, reject an incomplete submission, examine an elevated answer and record the questionnaire and inspection outcomes.
Run a failed-check case through nonconformance and corrective action, then review the action’s effectiveness against the original failure.
$0per user
The base account and everyday work in the ERP.AI app are free, for every user.
| Usage | Per $1 |
|---|---|
| Record reads (list, filter, get) | 20,000 |
| Search or aggregate queries | 4,000 |
| Record writes | 4,000 |
| Imported or synced records | 200,000 |
| Workflow runs | 2,000 |
| AI agent runs | 2,000 |
| Scheduled jobs or webhooks | 20,000 |
| File uploads (MB) | 2,000 |
| CSV or PDF exports | 100 |
Click Get started, then use Proto to configure Vendor IT Security Assessment for your business. Begin with one vendor questionnaire, one inspection subject, named owners and the current assessment procedure.
It identifies the vendor, version, due date, owner and review state. Control answers and their evidence link to that questionnaire.
Each answer has a risk rating. The Reviewer can inspect high and critical answers with their written response, attachment and parent questionnaire before deciding the questionnaire outcome.
Yes. An inspection has a subject reference and type. Agree a naming convention so the subject remains clear when the Reviewer opens its checks.
The Inspector records the result and observation. The Reviewer can link a nonconformance to the inspection and assign corrective work with an owner and due date.
The Corrective Action Owner records implementation. The Reviewer examines effectiveness against the linked nonconformance before approving closure.
Each finding belongs to an audit and has a requirement, finding text, severity, owner, due date and closed date.
An acknowledgment links a person to a controlled document and records its date. Keep document versions distinct so the record shows which procedure the person acknowledged.
Choose an exchange channel with the vendor during setup. The Inspector places each answer and attachment under the correct questionnaire version for review.
Use a pilot with the named Inspector, Reviewer, Assessment Owner and Corrective Action Owner. Check their working queues and direct record access with a representative case.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.