Connects to the tools you use
Set up connections through ERP.AI and Proto workflows, with every change logged.
- Manufacturing Analytics
- Production source
- Observation feed
- Capture register
- Evidence store
Manufacturing Analytics organizes production measurement around a dated production snapshots record. An owner links a production resource definition, records operating minutes and unit quantities, and relates machine run facts to the snapshot.
Production snapshots in one list
Independent Reviewer decides on the analyzed production source revision.
Every feature works on the same records. Pick one to see the screen your team works in.
Keep each production date, owner and measurement revision together.
Published waits for the operations manager
| Number | Name | Production date | Revision | Status | Owner | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS-46177 | Press line A, Oct 15 day shift | 01 Nov | 770 | Analyzed | Nora Tanaka | |
| PS-68206 | Assembly cell 3, Oct 15 day shift | 25 Oct | 930 | Analyzed | Aiko Serrano | |
| PS-32786 | Packing line 2, Oct 14 night shift | 13 Oct | 590 | Analyzed | Sofia Haddad | |
| PS-19381 | CNC bay B, Oct 14 evening shift | 16 Oct | 410 | Analyzed | Mina Farah | |
| PS-18097 | Mixer room 1, week 41 | 19 Oct | 150 | Analyzed | Mina Farah |
Review the accepted and rejected facts behind a production snapshot.
Approval conditions
| Sequence | Description | Observed on | Quantity | Outcome | Parent | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Press completed 420 good parts | 02 Nov | 400 | Pending | Press line A, Oct 15 day shift | |
| 10 | Assembly cell logged 18 rejects | 14 Oct | 780 | Pending | Mixer room 1, week 41 | |
| 40 | Pack line stopped for sensor fault | 25 Oct | 470 | Pending | Press line A, Oct 15 day shift | |
| 90 | CNC mill idled during tool change | 27 Oct | 560 | Pending | CNC bay B, Oct 14 evening shift | |
| 40 | Mixer batch weighed below target | 24 Oct | 840 | Pending | Mixer room 1, week 41 |
Read observed inputs and calculated results by period and dimension.
Metric results
| Metric | Period start | Period end | Dimension key | Value | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average changeover time | 01 Nov | 10 Nov | site=west;line=press-a | 960 | Calculated | |
| Average changeover time | 17 Oct | 23 Oct | site=west;line=assembly-3 | 90 | Suppressed | |
| Average changeover time | 25 Oct | 01 Nov | site=east;line=packing-2 | 450 | Invalid | |
| Average changeover time | 04 Nov | 10 Nov | site=east;cell=cnc-b | 450 | Calculated | |
| Machine utilization | 01 Nov | 06 Nov | site=north;room=mixer-1 | 110 | Suppressed |
Maintain effective measurement definitions and source mappings.
Approval waits for the independent reviewer
| Name | Grain | Unit | Version | Status | Reviewed by | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good units per labor hour | machine by shift | units/hour | v1.0 approved | Draft | Leila Chen | |
| First-pass yield | line by day | percent | v1.1 shift alignment | Draft | Sofia Haddad | |
| Unplanned downtime minutes | product by batch | minutes | v1.2 scrap exclusions | Draft | Sofia Haddad | |
| Scrap rate by product | work center by week | units | v2.0 downtime rules | Draft | Tariq Velasquez | |
| Average changeover time | site by month | hours | v2.1 batch weighting | Draft | Arun Mensah |
Inspect operation runs, numbered steps and recorded transitions.
Production snapshots
| Number | Name | Production date | Status | Owner | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS-25578 | Press line A, Oct 15 day shift | 14 Oct | Configured | Mina Farah | |
| PS-91314 | Assembly cell 3, Oct 15 day shift | 02 Nov | Collecting | Elias Duarte | |
| PS-95632 | Packing line 2, Oct 14 night shift | 15 Oct | Validated | Elias Duarte | |
| PS-36379 | CNC bay B, Oct 14 evening shift | 04 Nov | Analyzed | Nora Tanaka | |
| PS-49469 | Mixer room 1, week 41 | 19 Oct | Published | Mina Farah |
Connect reviewer decisions, supporting evidence and assigned actions.
Approval conditions
| Source | Source revision | Reviewer | Decision | Evidence reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welding cell 5, Oct 13 | 60 | Nora Tanaka | Pending | press_shift_review.pdf | |
| CNC bay B, Oct 14 evening shift | 110 | Sofia Haddad | Pending | assembly_reject_count.csv | |
| Welding cell 5, Oct 13 | 300 | Elias Duarte | Pending | packing_sensor_log.pdf | |
| Finishing line 1, Oct 12 | 920 | Tariq Velasquez | Pending | cnc_idle_audit.xlsx | |
| Mixer room 1, week 41 | 90 | Mina Farah | Pending | mixer_batch_sheet.pdf |
Production observation to reviewed result ships ready to use. One step needs a named approval before the work moves on: Review result (Independent Reviewer).
Set the effective definition, unit and source mapping.
Link dated machine facts and measured inputs to their production source.
Run validation for the selected source revision and inspect its outcome.
Calculate efficiency and confirm the persisted result fields.
Have an independent reviewer decide on the exact revision and evidence.
Give an exception a named assignee, due date and resolution.
Open any production snapshot to see its follow-up actions, the roles that work on it, its process stages and its approvals on one page.
Production date, Owner and Revision.
Each line is linked to this production snapshot.
Snapshot Owner, Production Analyst and Independent Reviewer, each with their own permissions.
Every status change, in order.
Review result, with who decides.
Configured
| Title | Due date | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Investigate press line microstops | 11 Oct | Open |
| Recount assembly rejects | 25 Oct | In progress |
| Replace packing sensor bracket | 01 Nov | Open |
The person preparing a source should not silently approve the same revision.
Signed in as Independent Reviewer
| Decision | Approver | |
|---|---|---|
| Review resultHave an independent reviewer decide on the exact revision and evidence. | Independent Reviewer | |
| Approve metric definitions | Independent Reviewer |
Everyone opens Manufacturing Analytics to the work that is theirs. Pick a role to see what it starts with.
Owns dated production snapshots and checks observations before validation.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Production snapshots · Snapshot Owner
Checks measurement inputs and runs validation and efficiency computation.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Source snapshots · Production Analyst
| Name | Coverage start | Coverage end | Captured at | Freshness status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Press line events, Oct 15 morning | 21 Oct | 25 Oct | 30 Oct | Fresh | |
| Assembly output, Oct 15 day shift | 20 Oct | 29 Oct | 01 Nov | Stale | |
| Packing rejects, Oct 14 night shift | 29 Oct | 02 Nov | 10 Nov | Fresh | |
| CNC cycle times, Oct 14 | 02 Nov | 05 Nov | 14 Nov | Stale | |
| Mixer batch totals, week 41 | 22 Oct | 29 Oct | 05 Nov | Fresh |
Maintains measurement definitions and field mappings for review.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Source snapshots · Metric Steward
| Name | Coverage start | Coverage end | Captured at | Freshness status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Press line events, Oct 15 morning | 21 Oct | 25 Oct | 30 Oct | Fresh | |
| Assembly output, Oct 15 day shift | 20 Oct | 29 Oct | 01 Nov | Stale | |
| Packing rejects, Oct 14 night shift | 29 Oct | 02 Nov | 10 Nov | Fresh | |
| CNC cycle times, Oct 14 | 02 Nov | 05 Nov | 14 Nov | Stale | |
| Mixer batch totals, week 41 | 22 Oct | 29 Oct | 05 Nov | Fresh |
Records decisions against a source revision and verifies evidence.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Metric definitions · Independent Reviewer
| Name | Grain | Unit | Version | Status | Reviewed by | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good units per labor hour | machine by shift | units/hour | v1.0 approved | Draft | Leila Chen | |
| First-pass yield | line by day | percent | v1.1 shift alignment | Draft | Sofia Haddad | |
| Unplanned downtime minutes | product by batch | minutes | v1.2 scrap exclusions | Draft | Sofia Haddad | |
| Scrap rate by product | work center by week | units | v2.0 downtime rules | Draft | Tariq Velasquez | |
| Average changeover time | site by month | hours | v2.1 batch weighting | Draft | Arun Mensah |
Reviews production results and assigns corrective work.
This is the first screen this role sees.
Production snapshots · Operations Manager
Configures organizations, people and access.
Ask production questions with source and revision context.
This quarter
How far records got this quarter
| Stage | Reached | Step | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configured | 42 | ||
| Collecting | 16 | 38% | |
| Validated | 6 | 38% | |
| Analyzed | 1 | 17% |
Sample totals per stage
Which dated sources show a change in the observed efficiency result?
Show production snapshots by lifecycle status.
How do scheduled and run minutes compare for each source?
Which production dates require a closer look at unit outcomes?
Group values by definition, period and dimension key.
Which capture windows are stale or failed before the next review?
Which source revisions have a failed or reconciliation-required run?
Which assigned actions are still open after their due date?
See how Manufacturing Analytics fits your kind of team.
Each stage of production observation to reviewed result names the role that acts and the status it records, so a change is never anonymous.
Each stage, the role that acts and the status it records
Prepare production reviews with traceable sources and decisions.
Set up connections through ERP.AI and Proto workflows, with every change logged.
Every record lives in a table you can see, extend and export. Add fields or whole tables in Proto.
Browse all 17 tablesStart with one team and one process, then add the rest once the basics are running.
Name the operating unit, production date rule, time and unit definitions, source system and responsible people.
Create organization and production resource records, source mappings and a reviewed metric definition.
Load a source capture, production snapshots and their linked observations for a short period.
Invoke validation and efficiency computation from the workspace. Check operation keys, steps, source revision and persisted fields.
Have a separate reviewer record a decision, then reconcile the displayed result with source evidence. Assign and close a follow-up for a questioned case.
$0per user
The base account and everyday work in the ERP.AI app are free, for every user.
| Usage | Per $1 |
|---|---|
| Record reads (list, filter, get) | 20,000 |
| Search or aggregate queries | 4,000 |
| Record writes | 4,000 |
| Imported or synced records | 200,000 |
| Workflow runs | 2,000 |
| AI agent runs | 2,000 |
| Scheduled jobs or webhooks | 20,000 |
| File uploads (MB) | 2,000 |
| CSV or PDF exports | 100 |
Click Get started, then use Proto to configure Manufacturing Analytics for your business. Pilot one production unit, a short date window, a reviewed measurement definition and a sample capture that the analyst and reviewer can reconcile together.
A dated production snapshot carries the owner, definition, observed time and unit measures, lifecycle status and revision. Linked machine facts, runs and decisions explain how that source was handled.
Yes. Machine run facts retain their sequence, observed date, quantity, source reference and outcome with a link to the parent production snapshot.
The analyst invokes the computation for a source revision in the Production Snapshots Workspace. The operation run and numbered steps show the attempt. A successful outcome follows a read-back of the persisted source fields. Period and dimension results can be reviewed through their linked metric result records.
A named reviewer records a decision against the exact source revision, with a reason and evidence reference. The operations manager checks that decision before using the reviewed source.
Organizations and effective production resource definitions give each source its context. Agree the metric grain, units and aggregation method before comparing results from different locations.
The source snapshot records its freshness state, capture time and coverage window. The analyst investigates the capture before using linked observations in a production review.
A manager assigns a due-dated action to a person. The assignee records progress, completion and resolution against the production source.
Yes, as a configured connection. Agree source IDs, field mappings, capture windows and reconciliation samples with the team that owns each upstream system.
Manual use follows the platform's published policy. Imports, integrations, agent execution and other machine work use credits; implementation is scoped separately. See pricing.
Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.