All applications583

Find your application

583 applications

Open full catalog

Browse applications by category or open the full catalog.

  1. Procurement
  2. Process
  3. Competitive sourcing
Process · Competitive sourcing

Competitive sourcing

Competitive sourcing keeps the requested scope, supplier offers and award reasoning together. Buyer can compare prices, quoted lead times and published quality evidence while preserving the difference between selecting an offer and approving the money needed to place its order.

Step by step

  1. Scope Buyer

    Buyer creates the RFQ from an approved requisition or as a standalone exercise. Department, cost centre and each line’s category support the later approval path. The scope retains quantities, units, need-by dates and original requisition references. Buyer sets the response deadline and evaluation weights before sending; a standalone exercise has no spend authority merely because it exists.

    • scope and routing dimensions prepared
    • Updates RFQs, RFQ lines, Purchase requisitions
  2. Invite Buyer

    Buyer chooses eligible Active suppliers and checks the category’s current verified qualification evidence. Each invitation retains its delivery and response state. Scope and weights freeze when sent through the configured supplier channel. A changed requirement needs a reviewed re-issue so bidders are compared against the same request.

    • eligible invitations sent; scope and weights frozen
    • Updates RFQs, RFQ invited suppliers, Supplier certifications
  3. Send and respond Supplier

    Supplier receives the invitation through configured access and submits its own priced lines, quoted lead times, commercial terms and proposed alternatives. Buyer controls sending; Supplier controls its response before the deadline. Withdrawals and revisions preserve their history. After the deadline, response changes cannot silently alter the comparison already under review.

    • supplier response retained for the issued scope
    • Updates RFQs, RFQ responses, RFQ response lines
  4. Compare Buyer

    Buyer reviews calculated price and quoted-lead-time scores alongside the latest published quality score with usable inspection observations. Missing quality history uses the documented neutral basis. Delivery punctuality remains separate evidence. Alternates, incomplete coverage, expired offers or incomparable quantities need explicit review before a low total can support an award.

    • comparable offers scored and recommendation recorded
    • Updates Bid comparison scores, Supplier performance
  5. Award Buyer or Procurement Manager

    Buyer records the selected offer and reason. Procurement Manager reviews a proposed departure from the recommendation before that exception is used. The award retains the response and decision evidence and creates a draft order. No acceptable offer leads to no award with its reason. Supplier notifications use the configured channel and remain separate delivery records.

    • reviewed offer selected or no award recorded
    • Updates RFQs, RFQ responses, Purchase orders
    ApprovalA person approves before the work moves on.
  6. Order approval Approver or Controller or Procurement Manager

    The resulting order must have matching unconsumed spend authority. Otherwise Approver, Controller or Procurement Manager decides the assigned matrix tiers. Standalone RFQ orders require matrix approval and cannot use the Buyer-limit exception. Procurement Manager separately clears price exceptions. A standalone RFQ award supplies no authority by itself. Buyer can propose a draft contract rate from the award for Procurement Manager activation.

    • spending authority and separate pricing decisions completed
    • Updates Purchase orders, Approval steps, Spend approvals, Spend approval lines, Commitment allocations, Contract rates
    Approvalwhen prior authority is insufficient

Checks built in

What Procurement enforces at each step.

  • Separate selection and authority. The winning response cannot create an approved spending allowance. Reused authority must match the order’s scope and remaining capacity.
  • Compare the requested coverage. A cheaper partial quote or alternate needs an explicit scope decision before award and order creation.
  • Use the right score. Rejection history informs quality; quoted lead time and actual delivery punctuality are distinct measures. Lateness alone does not change the RFQ quality score.
  • Record exceptions. Recommendation overrides retain the reason and Procurement Manager review. Later source changes cannot overwrite the recorded comparison.
  • Respect access. Supplier sees its own response and invited scope. Requester and Viewer cannot read competing quoted totals.
Buyer
Scopes, invites, compares and awards.
Supplier
Submits its own offer.
Procurement Manager
Reviews recommendation and pricing exceptions.
Approver
Decides assigned business tiers.
Controller
Decides its financial tier.
Requester
Supplies the original need and sees its outcome.

Set up Procurement your way.

Start free, then use Proto to change fields, steps and approvals before your team goes live.

How to get started

A personal agent for your business

Get started with Proto

Your app is selected. Download Proto, then open it with this context.

Selected appProcurement

Choose your computer’s platform.

Download Proto

Install Proto, then return to this panel.

Already installed? Open Proto

Free to use. Your own model provider may charge for usage.